[2004] KEHC 1032 (KLR)
The court found that the trial magistrate had considered the injuries suffered by the appellant, as evidenced by the analysis in the judgment and reference to the medical report and submissions. Although the magistrate did not cite specific authorities, the court was satisfied that the award of KES 50,000 was not so...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2004] KEHC 1032 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Moses Gerald Odongo; Respondent: Julius Birundu Mokaya
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisii
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Appeal 32 of 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Personal Injury, Quantum of Damages, Contributory Negligence
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Moses Gerald Odongo
Appellant
Julius Birundu Mokaya
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the award of KES 50,000 as general damages for pain and suffering was inordinately low as to amount to an error of principle.
- 2 Whether the trial magistrate properly considered the nature and extent of the appellant's injuries in assessing damages.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the trial magistrate had considered the injuries suffered by the appellant, as evidenced by the analysis in the judgment and reference to the medical report and submissions. Although the magistrate did not cite specific authorities, the court was satisfied that the award of KES 50,000 was not so low as to warrant interference. The injuries were assessed as moderately severe, with no loss of teeth or fractures, and the loose teeth could be treated. The appellate court concluded that there was no error of principle or misapprehension of the evidence by the trial court, and therefore the appeal lacked merit and was dismissed with costs.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed with costs to the respondent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
17 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KISII CIVIL APPEAL NO. 32 OF 2002 (From original civil suit No.278 of 1999 of the CM’s court at Kisii.)
MOSES GERALD ODONGO ..……………………………………….. APPELLANT
VERSUS
JULIUS BIRUNDU MOKAYA ……………………………………… RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT:
The appellant’s appeal is against the award of quantum of damages by Senior Resident Magistrate Kisii in Kisii CMCC No.278 of 1999. In that case he was the plaintiff and the respondent was the defendant.
The appellant was on 16th June 1998 a passenger in motor vehicle No.KAE 465Q traveling to Nairobi from Oyugis. On reaching the molo junction along Eldoret Nakuru road the vehicle collided with m/v Reg. No.KAJ 175T owned by the defendant. The plaintiff sustained injuries and was taken to hospital. He told court that the driver of the defendant’s vehicle was to blame for the accident.
The case proceeded for full hearing before Mrs. Owino SRM. Judgment was delivered on 28/2/02. The court found the defendant liable to the tune of 80% and 20% contribution negligence. She then awarded general damages for pain and suffering for the sum of sh.50,000/=. There was no award for special damages. The appeal is against the appeal of sh.50,000/= general damages.
It was submitted that the learned magistrate erred in awarding sh.50,000/= damages. The award was so inordinately low that it amounted to an error of principle. Mr. Ochillo went on to submit that the injuries suffered were serious and the defendant did not call any evidence to rebut them. In her judgment the magistrate did not indicate the factors she considered to arrive at the award. He submitted that the court should have awarded sh.150,000/=. Mr. Wesonga for the respondent submitted that the injuries were not serious and the award was proper.
According to medical report (Exh.3) by DR. J.O. ODONDI and P3 form – Exh.1 the appellant sustained a cut wound on the lower lip, loosening of two teeth, injuries on the chest and the lower limbs. The doctor assessed the injuries as moderately severe and concluded that the loose teeth can be treated. I concur with counsel for the respondent that the injuries were not serious. The magistrate in par.3 on page one of the judgment analyzed the injuries suffered, which shows she took them into consideration. She said she had considered the submissions and I would believe the authorities cited. True she did not indicate which particular authority she relied on but one cannot say that she plucked the figure of sh.50,000/= from the blues. The sum awarded in the light of the injuries was not so low to warrant this court to interfere with the same. Appellant did not loose any teeth or suffer any fracture.
In the circumstances I find appeal has no merit and the same is dismissed with costs.
Dated 13th October 2004.
KABURU BAUNI
JUDGE
13/10/04
Mr. Oguttu H/B for Mr. Ochillo for applicant.
Mr. Minda for Muchui for the Respondent.