[2015] KEELC 661 (KLR)
The court found that the Applicants had established, on a balance of probabilities, that they had been in continuous, open, and exclusive possession of the suit property for over 33 years without the permission of the registered owners. The Respondents, despite being served, did not contest the claim or provide...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2015] KEELC 661 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Moses Masivai Barasa; Applicant: Dzame Akida Deche; Respondent: Charles David Howard Hewitt Stubbs; Respondent: David Ewart Lennard Slater
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Malindi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- ? 87 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Originating Summons / Judgment
- Outcome
- suit allowed
- Judges
- OA Angote
- Legal Topics
- Adverse Possession, Land Ownership, Title Registration
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Moses Masivai Barasa
Applicant
Dzame Akida Deche
Applicant
Charles David Howard Hewitt Stubbs
Respondent
David Ewart Lennard Slater
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Originating Summons / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Applicants are entitled to be declared proprietors of plot number 1705/233/41-Kilifi by virtue of adverse possession.
- 2 Whether the Applicants are entitled to be registered as owners and issued with a certificate of title for the suit property.
- 3 Whether the Applicants are entitled to costs of the suit.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the Applicants had established, on a balance of probabilities, that they had been in continuous, open, and exclusive possession of the suit property for over 33 years without the permission of the registered owners. The Respondents, despite being served, did not contest the claim or provide evidence to the contrary. The Applicants' possession was confirmed by documentary evidence and a letter from the local chief. The court held that the Applicants had dispossessed the Respondents for the requisite statutory period and were therefore entitled to be declared proprietors by adverse possession and to be registered as owners of the suit property.
Court Disposition
suit allowed
Orders
- The Applicants are declared proprietors of plot number 1705/233/41-Kilifi by adverse possession.
- The Applicants shall be registered as owners of plot number 1705/233/41-Kilifi as tenants in common and issued with a certificate of title.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
33 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT
AT MALINDI
ELC CIVIL CASE NO. 87 OF 2014 (O.S)
1. MOSES MASIVAI BARASA
2. DZAME AKIDA DECHE........................................................APPLICANTS
=VERSUS=
1. CHARLES DAVID HOWARD HEWITT STUBBS
2. DAVID EWART LENNARD SLATER ........................... RESPONDENTS
J U D G M E N T
Introduction:
1. This suit was commenced by way of an Originating Summons. In the suit, the Applicants are seeking for the determination of the following questions.
(a) Whether the Applicants are entitled to be declared as the proprietors of 4. 514 Ha of plot number 1705/233/41- Kilifi, which they have acquired by adverse possession after staying on the plot for over twelve (12) years.
(b) Whether the Applicants are entitled to be registered as the owners of plot number 1705/233/41 Kilifi and be issued with a Certificate of title.
(c) Whether the Applicants are entitled to the costs of the suit.
2. The Respondents were served with the pleadings by way of advertisement in the Daily Nation of 9th October 2014. The Respondents did not enter appearance or file a Replying Affidavit.
The Applicants' case:
3. According to the Applicants' Supporting Affidavit, they have lived on the suit property for over 33 years.
4. The 1st Applicant deponed that his parents entered the suit property in 1981 without any body's authority and that his late father lived on the land for 17 years before he died.
5. It is the Applicants' case that the Respondents have never occupied the suit property and that they have dispossessed the Respondents the suit property for a period of over 12 years and therefore entitled to the property.
Submissions:
6. The Applicants' advocate submitted that the Applicants had proved that they entered to the suit property in 1981 without the Respondents' permission; that there is evidence of actual possession of the suit property for a period of over 33 years and that the Applicants have also proved that their possession of the suit property has had no interruption from anybody.
Analysis and findings:
7. The Applicants annexed on their Supporting Affidavit the Certificate of Postal Search as on 28th April 2014 which shows that the Respondents are the registered proprietors of the suit property.
8. The Applications also annexed a letter from the Senior Chief of Kilifi Township Location dated 4th April 2014. In the letter, the Chief has stated that indeed the Applicants have been living on the suit property for more than 33 years without any interruption.
9. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, I am satisfied that the Applicants have proved their case on a balance of probabilities and are entitled to the orders being sought in the Originating Summons.
10. For those reasons, I allow the Applicants' suit in the following terms:
(a) The Applicants be and are hereby declared as the proprietors of plot number 1705/233/41-Kilifi which they have acquired by adverse possession.
(b) The Applicants be registered as the owners of plot number 1705/233/4 as tenants in common and be issued with a certificate of title.
(c) Each party to pay his own costs
Dated and delivered in Malindi this 13th day of February,2015.
O. A. Angote
Judge