[2021] KEHC 8289 (KLR)
The court held that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain a fresh resentencing petition where the High Court had already substituted the original sentence on appeal after considering mitigation. The petitioner, having had his sentence reviewed and reduced from life imprisonment to 20 years, could not seek a further...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] KEHC 8289 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Moses Muli King’oo; Respondent: Director of Public Prosecutions
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Mombasa
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Petition 218 of 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Petition / Judgment on Resentencing
- Outcome
- petition dismissed
- Judges
- DO Ogembo
- Legal Topics
- Resentencing, Sexual Offences, Defilement, Appeals Process
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Moses Muli King’oo
Applicant
Director of Public Prosecutions
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Petition / Judgment on Resentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court can entertain a fresh resentencing application after it has already substituted the original sentence on appeal.
- 2 Whether the petitioner is entitled to further review of sentence after the High Court has already exercised its appellate jurisdiction.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain a fresh resentencing petition where the High Court had already substituted the original sentence on appeal after considering mitigation. The petitioner, having had his sentence reviewed and reduced from life imprisonment to 20 years, could not seek a further review through a new petition. The proper recourse for dissatisfaction with the appellate decision was to appeal to the Court of Appeal, not to file a fresh resentencing application in the High Court. Entertaining such applications would undermine the finality of appellate decisions and create an unmanageable situation where all previously sentenced prisoners could seek repeated...
Court Disposition
petition dismissed
Orders
- The petition for resentencing is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
20 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT MOMBASA
PETITION NO. 218 OF 2019
MOSES MULI KING’OO......................................PETITIONER
VERSUS
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS....RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT ON RESENTENCING
1. The Petitioner MOSES MULI KING’OOwas tried and convicted of the Offence of defilement contrary to 8 (3) as read with Section 8 (2) of the Sexual Offences Act, and sentenced to life imprisonment. The Petitioner appealed to the High Court and his sentence to life imprisonment was substituted with a sentence of 20 years from the date he was sentenced by the trial court.
2. I will not go into the details of this petition since the resentence was already done by the High Court in Mombasa Criminal Appeal No. 69 of 2018 where the learned Lady Justice Njoki Mwangi in her judgment at Paragraph 59 stated, “the provisions of Section 8(3) of the Sexual Offences Act provides for a minimum sentence of 20 years imprisonment for a person who defiles a child of 12 years of age. I therefore set aside the life imprisonment and substitute with a sentence of 20 years imprisonment. The sentence shall run from 3rd October, 2017 being the date he was sentenced by the trial court.”
3. In my view, the Petitioner is overstretching his luck. When he appealed to the High Court, the said court reviewed his sentence from life imprisonment to 20 years in prison. This was done after the court heard the Petitioner’s mitigation.
4. Justice Joel Ngugi inJohn Kagunda Kariuki v Republic [2019] eKLRheld that “…. persons whose appeals have already been heard by the High Court are not entitled to file fresh applications for re-sentencing in accordance with the new decisional law. To reach a different conclusion would lead to an ungovernable situation where all previously sentenced prisoners would seek review of their sentences.”The petitioner’s sentence was already reviewed in appeal. This court cannot purport to do it again.
5. My view is that if the Petitioner was not satisfied with the High court’s decision on Appeal, he should have escalated the same to the Court of Appeal. He did not satisfy all the avenues before coming back for re-sentencing. At this juncture, the High Court cannot deal with the re-sentence and as such the Petition is hereby dismissed.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT MOMBASA THIS 9TH DAY OF MARCH, 2021.
E. K. OGOLA
JUDGE
Judgment delivered via MS Teams in the presence of:
Petitioner in person
Mr. Fedha for DPP
Mr. Josephat Court Assistant