[2013] KEELRC 765 (KLR)

[2013] KEELRC 765 (KLR)

The court found that the claimant had served the respondent continuously for four years, and in the absence of employment records from the respondent, accepted the claimant's evidence of uninterrupted service. By operation of section 37 of the Employment Act, 2007, the claimant's status converted from casual to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2013] KEELRC 765 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Moses Nganga Wanjiku; Respondent: The Chairman, Board of Directors Berea Theological College
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nakuru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 87 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
judgment for the claimant
Judges
B Ongaya
Legal Topics
Unfair Termination, Conversion of Casual to Permanent, Employment Benefits, Statutory Entitlements
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Unfair Termination Conversion of Casual to Permanent Employment Benefits Statutory Entitlements

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Moses Nganga Wanjiku

Claimant

The Chairman, Board of Directors Berea Theological College

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the claimant was a casual worker or a permanent employee entitled to statutory benefits.
  2. 2 Whether the termination of the claimant's employment was unfair and if he is entitled to remedies.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the claimant had served the respondent continuously for four years, and in the absence of employment records from the respondent, accepted the claimant's evidence of uninterrupted service. By operation of section 37 of the Employment Act, 2007, the claimant's status converted from casual to permanent, entitling him to statutory minimum terms and protections. The respondent failed to provide notice or a hearing prior to termination, violating section 41 of the Act. The termination was therefore unfair. The court awarded the claimant compensation equivalent to six months' salary at the last undisputed monthly rate, and service pay for four years, but declined to award...

Court Disposition

judgment for the claimant

Orders

  • A declaration that the termination of the claimant’s employment by the respondent was unfair.
  • The respondent to pay the claimant a sum of Kshs.42,000 by 1.11.2013, failing which interest to be payable at court rates from the date of judgment until full payment.