[2020] KEELC 3180 (KLR)

[2020] KEELC 3180 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiff had entered into a valid sale agreement for a portion of LR No. Dagoretti/Riruta/10, had paid a substantial part of the purchase price, and had been put in possession of the land. The defendant failed to attend court or controvert the plaintiff's evidence. The plaintiff...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEELC 3180 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Moses Ngene Munyiri; Defendant: Peter Nguku Kungu
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 1506 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Land and Property Suit / Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for the plaintiff.
Judges
EO Obaga
Legal Topics
Specific Performance, Sale of Land, Injunctions, Breach of Contract
Source Language
en
Land and Property Specific Performance Sale of Land Injunctions Breach of Contract

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Moses Ngene Munyiri

Plaintiff

Peter Nguku Kungu

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Land and Property Suit / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to specific performance of the sale agreement for a portion of LR No. Dagoretti/Riruta/10.
  2. 2 Whether a permanent injunction should issue restraining the defendant from interfering with the plaintiff's occupation of the purchased portion.
  3. 3 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to damages for breach of agreement.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff had entered into a valid sale agreement for a portion of LR No. Dagoretti/Riruta/10, had paid a substantial part of the purchase price, and had been put in possession of the land. The defendant failed to attend court or controvert the plaintiff's evidence. The plaintiff demonstrated readiness and willingness to complete the transaction. The court held that specific performance was the appropriate remedy, as the plaintiff had proved his case on a balance of probabilities and damages would not be an adequate remedy. The court also found that a permanent injunction was warranted to protect the plaintiff's occupation and interest in the property. General...

Court Disposition

Judgment for the plaintiff.

Orders

  • Specific performance of the sale agreements for the portion measuring 52.3 metres by 50 metres out of LR No. Dagoretti/Riruta/10.
  • A permanent injunction restraining the defendant and his agents from interfering with the plaintiff's occupation of the said portion of land.