[2016] KEHC 4656 (KLR)

[2016] KEHC 4656 (KLR)

The court held that since the applicant was sentenced to seven years imprisonment and had the right to appeal but failed to do so, he cannot seek revision as a substitute for an appeal. Furthermore, the offence of stealing stock, for which the applicant was convicted, does not fall within the scope of offences...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] KEHC 4656 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Moses Oduori Were; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kakamega
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Revision 289 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling on Revision
Outcome
Application for revision dismissed.
Judges
AW Mwangi
Legal Topics
Stealing Stock, Sentencing, Community Service Orders, Revision Jurisdiction
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Stealing Stock Sentencing Community Service Orders Revision Jurisdiction

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Moses Oduori Were

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Revision / Ruling on Revision

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to revision of sentence after failing to appeal the conviction and sentence.
  2. 2 Whether the offence of stealing stock qualifies for a Community Service Order under the relevant law.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that since the applicant was sentenced to seven years imprisonment and had the right to appeal but failed to do so, he cannot seek revision as a substitute for an appeal. Furthermore, the offence of stealing stock, for which the applicant was convicted, does not fall within the scope of offences eligible for Community Service Orders, especially given the length of the sentence and the nature of the offence. The probation report was also unfavourable, and even if it had been favourable, the court would not have considered Community Service appropriate for this offence.

Court Disposition

Application for revision dismissed.

Orders

  • The application for revision is dismissed.