[1999] KECA 34 (KLR)

[1999] KECA 34 (KLR)

The court found that since the applicant's appeal was heard and determined in his absence, his constitutional right to a fair and impartial trial was violated. This legitimate grievance justified the extension of time for filing an appeal. The court exercised its discretion to allow the application and granted the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1999] KECA 34 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Moses Shivachi Shikali; Respondent: Republic
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Application 5 of 1999
Procedural Posture
Criminal Application / Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
Outcome
application allowed
Legal Topics
Right to Fair Trial, Appeal Out of Time
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Constitutional Law Right to Fair Trial Appeal Out of Time

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Moses Shivachi Shikali

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Application / Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time

  1. 1 Whether the applicant's constitutional right to a fair and impartial trial was violated by hearing and determining the appeal in his absence.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to an extension of time to file an appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that since the applicant's appeal was heard and determined in his absence, his constitutional right to a fair and impartial trial was violated. This legitimate grievance justified the extension of time for filing an appeal. The court exercised its discretion to allow the application and granted the applicant thirty days from the date of the ruling to file his appeal.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • Time for filing an appeal is extended by thirty days from the date of this ruling.