[1999] KECA 59 (KLR)

[1999] KECA 59 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant's constitutional right to a fair and impartial trial was violated because the appeal was heard and determined in his absence. This constituted sufficient cause to grant the application for extension of time. The court exercised its discretion to allow the applicant to file an...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1999] KECA 59 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Moses Shivachi Shikali; Respondent: Republic
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Application 5 of 1999
Procedural Posture
Criminal Application / Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
Outcome
application allowed
Legal Topics
Right to Fair Trial, Appeal Out of Time
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Right to Fair Trial Appeal Out of Time

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Moses Shivachi Shikali

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Application / Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time

  1. 1 Whether the applicant's constitutional right to a fair and impartial trial was violated by the hearing and determination of the appeal in his absence.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to file an appeal out of time.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant's constitutional right to a fair and impartial trial was violated because the appeal was heard and determined in his absence. This constituted sufficient cause to grant the application for extension of time. The court exercised its discretion to allow the applicant to file an appeal out of time, recognizing the fundamental importance of the right to be present and to participate in one's own appeal proceedings.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • Time for filing an appeal is extended by thirty days from the date of this ruling.