[2015] KEHC 8145 (KLR)
The court found that the summary dismissal of a suit is a severe action that removes the plaintiff from the judgment seat without a hearing. Given the explanation provided by the applicant regarding the inadvertence of counsel and the reasonable steps taken, the court determined that it would be unfair to deny leave...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2015] KEHC 8145 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Mosese Kimari; Respondent: Shammi Kanjirapprambil Thomas; Respondent: Spectaasaver (K) Limited; Respondent: Prime Bank Limited
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Case 38 of 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Leave to Appeal / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted to the applicant.
- Judges
- F Gikonyo
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Appeal, Summary Dismissal, Notice of Appeal, Mistake of Counsel
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mosese Kimari
Applicant
Shammi Kanjirapprambil Thomas
Respondent
Spectaasaver (K) Limited
Respondent
Prime Bank Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to appeal against the order dismissing the suit.
- 2 Whether the applicant's failure to attend the delivery of the ruling due to counsel's inadvertence is a sufficient reason for granting leave.
- 3 Whether leave is required to file a notice of appeal against an order of dismissal of suit.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the summary dismissal of a suit is a severe action that removes the plaintiff from the judgment seat without a hearing. Given the explanation provided by the applicant regarding the inadvertence of counsel and the reasonable steps taken, the court determined that it would be unfair to deny leave to appeal. The court accepted the apology of counsel and held that the mistake should not be visited upon the client. The court therefore granted leave to the applicant to appeal against the order of dismissal, without delving into the necessity of leave for filing a notice of appeal or the prospects of the intended appeal, which are matters for the appellate court.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted to the applicant.
Orders
- Leave is hereby granted to the applicant to appeal against the order of dismissal of the suit.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
19 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MACHAKOS
MILIMANI COMMERCIAL COURTS
CIVIL CASE NO. 38 OF 2010
MOSESE KIMARI…………………........................................………. APPLICANT
Versus
SHAMMI KANJIRAPPRAMBIL THOMAS…..…………….….1ST RESPONDENT
SPECTAASAVER (K) LIMITED………………………….…..2ND RESPONDENT
PRIME BANK LIMITED……………………………………….3RD RESPONDENT
RULING
Leave to appeal
[1] This suit was dismissed by the Court on 31st July, 2014 upon the application by the Defendants in that behalf. The Plaintiff has now applied through the application dated 14. 8.2014 for leave of the Court to lodged an appeal against the decision of the Court delivered on 31st day of July, 2014. The Plaintiff proffers three major reasons for leave. The first one is; it is a requirement of the law that he should seek leave of the Court before he files an appeal. The second; the non-attendance during the delivery of the ruling was out of inadvertence on the part of his counsel. Had counsel attended court, he definitely would have applied for leave immediately on delivery of the ruling herein. I am pleased to note counsel is apologetic for his failure to attend court and I accept it. That is the behaviour of a diligent advocate. Third reason is that the court did not consider his application dated 9th day of May, 2013 for leave to amend the plaint despite the fact that this Court had directed that the two applications, the one for dismissal and for leave, shall be heard together. Fourth, the Plaintiff stated that he had filed a Notice of Appeal before expiry of the 14 days allowed in law to file appeal. He has even served the Notice of Appeal on the advocates for the Defendants; they have also filed Notice of Address of Service under rule 79 of the Court of Appeal Rules. The Plaintiff argued that he needed no leave in order to file a Notice of Appeal. The Plaintiff believes he has an arguable appeal with high chances of success. He is convinced he should be granted leave to appeal.
[2] The application is supported by the affidavit of the Plaintiff sworn on 14th day of August, 2014.
[3] The Defendants opposed the application for leave on the grounds that it has been overtaken by events and it will be a futile exercise. They said that the Plaintiff had already filed a Notice of Appeal out of time and without leave of the Court.
DETERMINATION
[4] Courts have said time and again, that, summary dismissal of suit is a draconian act comparable only to an act of drawing the proverbial ‘’Sword of the Damocles’’. The Plaintiff is completely driven away from the judgment seat without being heard. And as a court of law, it would be unfair to refuse leave to appeal against such order if indeed it is a requirement of law. In any event, the explanation given by the Plaintiff is sufficient and reasonable. I will not visit mistake of counsel on the client. That would be most unfair. In the circumstances, I hereby grant leave to the Plaintiff to appeal against my order of dismissal of the suit. Meanwhile, I do not wish to discuss the purport of the decision in the case of CA at NAIROBI CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 77 OF 2003 (UR.40/03) or whether a person needs leave before he can file a Notice of Appeal on an order of dismissal of suit. Similarly, I do not wish to discuss whether leave is required on an order of dismissal of suit which, in its very nature, is a final order that completely decimates the suit and the rights of the Plaintiff. Also, the prospects or otherwise of the appeal will be decided in another forum; the Court of Appeal. It is so ordered.
Dated, signed and delivered in court at Nairobi this 19th day of March 2015
F. GIKONYO
JUDGE