[2023] KECPT 836 (KLR)
The Tribunal found that the Claimant had proven her membership and the amount contributed through documentary evidence (her payslip). The Respondent failed to provide any documentary evidence to support their defenses, including the alleged fine, processing fee, or that the claim was time-barred. The Tribunal held...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KECPT 836 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Evalyne Moshira; Respondent: Kwetu Cooperative Society Ltd
- Court
- Cooperative Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Tribunal Case 441 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Claim / Judgment
- Outcome
- judgment for the applicant
- Judges
- BM Kimemia, J. Mwatsama, B Sawe, F Lotuiya, P. Gichuki, M Chesikaw, PO Aol
- Legal Topics
- Sacco Member Refund, Member Withdrawal Rights, Deductions on Refund
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Evalyne Moshira
Applicant
Kwetu Cooperative Society Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Claim / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Claimant is entitled to a refund of her contributions from the Respondent Sacco.
- 2 Whether the Respondent was justified in deducting processing fees or fines from the Claimant's refund.
- 3 Whether the claim is time-barred.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the Claimant had proven her membership and the amount contributed through documentary evidence (her payslip). The Respondent failed to provide any documentary evidence to support their defenses, including the alleged fine, processing fee, or that the claim was time-barred. The Tribunal held that the Claimant was entitled to a full refund of Kshs. 226,000, with costs and interest, as the Respondent did not substantiate any lawful deductions or their other claims. The absence of the Statement of Account from the Respondent, despite multiple opportunities, further undermined their position. The Tribunal thus entered judgment for the Claimant.
Court Disposition
judgment for the applicant
Orders
- Judgment entered in favour of the Claimant for Kshs. 226,000 plus costs and interest.
- Respondent granted 30 days stay of execution.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
21 paragraphs
Moshira v Kwetu Cooperative Society Ltd (Tribunal Case 441 of 2018) [2023] KECPT 836 (KLR) (Civ) (8 June 2023) (Judgment)
Neutral citation: [2023] KECPT 836 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Cooperative Tribunal
Civil
Tribunal Case 441 of 2018
BM Kimemia, Chair, J. Mwatsama, Vice Chair, B Sawe, F Lotuiya, P. Gichuki, M Chesikaw & PO Aol, Members
June 8, 2023
Between
Evalyne Moshira
Claimant
and
Kwetu Cooperative Society Ltd
Respondent
Judgment
1. The Claimant filed a Statement of Claim date 12/9/18 filed on 13/9/18 where she avers she was a member of the Respondent formerly known as Masaku Teachers Sacco and was Member Number 22392. She had contributions amounting to Kshs. 226,000/=. The Claimant notified the Respondent of her intention to withdraw and as at the time of filing this suit, the Respondent had not refunded her.The Claimant pays for:a.Recovery of Kshs. 226,000/=.b.Interest on (a) above at Court fees.c.Costs of this suit.
2. The Respondent filed a Statement of Defence dated 18/10/18 filed on the same date. The Respondent denies that the Claimant was their member and denies being indebted. The Respondent states the Claimant is in breach of the By-laws and to be fined Kshs. 20,000/=.They further aver that a deduction of 5% processing fee had to be deducted and thus any monies to be paid by the Respondent to the Claimant ought to be done after deductions and further state that the suit is time barred.
3. Being a refund matter parties were directed to file their Written Submissions to dispense off with the claim. The Respondent filed their Written Submissions dated 15/9/22 filed on 3/11/22. We note the Respondent were to file the Claimant’s Statement of Account as ordered on 1/9/2021. Again on 7/11/2021 the Respondent were granted another opportunity but failed to do so.
4. The issue for determination is whether the Claimant is entitled to a refund?The Claimant filed their pay slip of August 2015 evidencing the deductions done. The said payslip shows the Claimant has savings of Kshs. 226,000/=. What more should we delve in when Respondent did not file any document to support their claim.
5. We find the Claimant has proven their case and as such enter judgement in favour of the Claimant against Respondent for Kshs. 226,000/= plus costs and interest.
JUDGMENT SIGNED, DATED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY AT NAIROBI THIS 8TH DAY OF JUNE, 2023. HON. BEATRICE KIMEMIA - CHAIRPERSON SIGNED 8. 6.2023HON. J. MWATSAMA - DEPUTY CHAIRPERSON SIGNED 8. 6.2023HON. BEATRICE SAWE - MEMBER SIGNED 8. 6.2023HON. FRIDAH LOTUIYA - MEMBER SIGNED 8. 6.2023HON. PHILIP GICHUKI - MEMBER SIGNED 8. 6.2023HON. MICHAEL CHESIKAW - MEMBER SIGNED 8. 6.2023HON. PAUL AOL - MEMBER SIGNED 8. 6.2023TRIBUNAL CLERK JEMIMAHNgichamba advocate for the RespondentEverlyne Moshira – No appearanceJudgment delivered.Ngichamba advocate – we seek for 30 days stay of executionTribunal-Respondent granted 30 days stay of executionHON. J. MWATSAMA - DEPUTY CHAIRPERSON SIGNED 8. 6.2023