[2005] KECA 287 (KLR)

[2005] KECA 287 (KLR)

The Court of Appeal found that the respondent was entitled to judgment in the sum of Kshs. 1,500,000, inclusive of all interests, as decreed by the High Court. The appellants were to be credited with the Kshs. 1,000,000 already paid. The court affirmed the High Court's decision regarding the principal sum and costs,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2005] KECA 287 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: M.R. Construction (K) Ltd.; Appellant: Coast Project Ltd.; Respondent: Mrs. Sarvjit Kaur Rayet
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Malindi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal 261 of 2003
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; judgment for the respondent with credit for sums already paid; no order as to costs of appeal and cross-appeal.
Legal Topics
Contractual Liability, Debt Recovery
Source Language
en
Commercial and Corporate Contractual Liability Debt Recovery

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

M.R. Construction (K) Ltd.

Appellant

Coast Project Ltd.

Appellant

Mrs. Sarvjit Kaur Rayet

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the appellants were liable to pay the respondent the sum claimed under the contract.
  2. 2 Whether the sum already paid by the appellants should be credited against the judgment amount.
  3. 3 Whether the respondent was entitled to costs of the suit.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court of Appeal found that the respondent was entitled to judgment in the sum of Kshs. 1,500,000, inclusive of all interests, as decreed by the High Court. The appellants were to be credited with the Kshs. 1,000,000 already paid. The court affirmed the High Court's decision regarding the principal sum and costs, holding that the respondent had established her claim and was entitled to the balance due. No order was made as to the costs of the appeal and cross-appeal, reflecting the court's discretion in the circumstances.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; judgment for the respondent with credit for sums already paid; no order as to costs of appeal and cross-appeal.

Orders

  • Judgment entered for the respondent in the sum of Kshs. 1,500,000 inclusive of all interests.
  • Respondent awarded costs of the suit in the superior court, to be agreed or taxed if not agreed.