[2024] KEELC 6069 (KLR)

[2024] KEELC 6069 (KLR)

The court found that the proposed amendments to the memorandum of appeal would assist in determining the real questions in controversy between the parties. Since directions on the disposal of the appeal had not yet been issued and the respondent had not opposed the application, the court was satisfied that no...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEELC 6069 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Charles Mtsonga; Applicant: Felister Sidi Kabathe; Respondent: George Kiiru Miringu
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Malindi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment and Land Appeal E029 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Appeal / Ruling on Application for Leave to Amend Memorandum of Appeal
Outcome
Application for leave to amend memorandum of appeal allowed.
Judges
FM Njoroge
Legal Topics
Amendment of Pleadings, Leave to Amend, Memorandum of Appeal, Court Discretion, Prejudice to Parties
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Amendment of Pleadings Leave to Amend Memorandum of Appeal Court Discretion Prejudice to Parties

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Charles Mtsonga

Applicant

Felister Sidi Kabathe

Applicant

George Kiiru Miringu

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Environment and Land Appeal / Ruling on Application for Leave to Amend Memorandum of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicants should be granted leave to amend the memorandum of appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the proposed amendments would prejudice the respondent or are necessary for the determination of the real issues in controversy.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the proposed amendments to the memorandum of appeal would assist in determining the real questions in controversy between the parties. Since directions on the disposal of the appeal had not yet been issued and the respondent had not opposed the application, the court was satisfied that no prejudice would be occasioned to the respondent. Exercising its discretion under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Act and Order 8 Rule 5(1) of the Civil Procedure Rules, the court allowed the application for leave to amend the memorandum of appeal, holding that the interests of justice required the amendment and that no injustice or prejudice would result.

Court Disposition

Application for leave to amend memorandum of appeal allowed.

Orders

  • The application dated 7/3/2024 is allowed with no orders as to costs.
  • The appellants shall file and serve their record of appeal upon the respondent within 30 days of this order.