[2024] KEELC 6069 (KLR)
The court found that the proposed amendments to the memorandum of appeal would assist in determining the real questions in controversy between the parties. Since directions on the disposal of the appeal had not yet been issued and the respondent had not opposed the application, the court was satisfied that no...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEELC 6069 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Charles Mtsonga; Applicant: Felister Sidi Kabathe; Respondent: George Kiiru Miringu
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Malindi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment and Land Appeal E029 of 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Environment and Land Appeal / Ruling on Application for Leave to Amend Memorandum of Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for leave to amend memorandum of appeal allowed.
- Judges
- FM Njoroge
- Legal Topics
- Amendment of Pleadings, Leave to Amend, Memorandum of Appeal, Court Discretion, Prejudice to Parties
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Charles Mtsonga
Applicant
Felister Sidi Kabathe
Applicant
George Kiiru Miringu
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Appeal / Ruling on Application for Leave to Amend Memorandum of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants should be granted leave to amend the memorandum of appeal.
- 2 Whether the proposed amendments would prejudice the respondent or are necessary for the determination of the real issues in controversy.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the proposed amendments to the memorandum of appeal would assist in determining the real questions in controversy between the parties. Since directions on the disposal of the appeal had not yet been issued and the respondent had not opposed the application, the court was satisfied that no prejudice would be occasioned to the respondent. Exercising its discretion under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Act and Order 8 Rule 5(1) of the Civil Procedure Rules, the court allowed the application for leave to amend the memorandum of appeal, holding that the interests of justice required the amendment and that no injustice or prejudice would result.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to amend memorandum of appeal allowed.
Orders
- The application dated 7/3/2024 is allowed with no orders as to costs.
- The appellants shall file and serve their record of appeal upon the respondent within 30 days of this order.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
25 paragraphs
Mtsonga & another v Miringu (Environment and Land Appeal E029 of 2023) [2024] KEELC 6069 (KLR) (24 September 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEELC 6069 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Environment and Land Court at Malindi
Environment and Land Appeal E029 of 2023
FM Njoroge, J
September 24, 2024
Between
Charles Mtsonga
1st Applicant
Felister Sidi Kabathe
2nd Applicant
and
George Kiiru Miringu
Respondent
Ruling
1. Before me is the notice of motion dated 7/3/2024 wherein the applicants seek leave to amend the memorandum of appeal lodged on 21/6/2023 as per the proposed amended memorandum of appeal. The grounds in support of the application for leave to amend is to the effect that: -a.It has become imperative that the memorandum of appeal be amended.b.The proposed amendments will assist this honourable court to determine all the issued in controversy/dispute between the Appellants and the Respondent.c.The amendment will not prejudice the Respondent and it is in the interest of justice that the Plaint be amended.
2. In support of the application is the affidavit sworn on the even date by Samuel Odhiambo Eleakim, counsel for the Applicants.
3. As at the time of writing this ruling, the Respondent had not filed any response. The application is therefore unopposed. Moreover, none of the parties filed written submissions as directed by the court on 3/6/2024. That notwithstanding, I will consider the application on its merits.
4. It is trite that the court has unfettered discretion to allow an amendment at any stage of the proceedings. Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Act provides that: -The court may at any time, and on such terms as to costs or otherwise as it may think fit, amend any defect or error in any proceeding in a suit; and all necessary amendments shall be made for the purpose of determining the real question or issue raised by or depending on the proceeding.”
5. The Court of Appeal in George Gikubu Mbuthia –v- Consolidated Bank of Kenya Ltd & Anor [2016] eKLR expressed itself as follows: -As regards the law, the High court readily accepted that the court has unfettered discretion to allow amendment of pleadings, which discretion must be exercised judiciously. It accepted too as a general position that parties to a suit have the right to amend their pleadings at any stage of the proceedings before judgment and that court should liberally allow such amendments. However, he also noted situations when the court will refuse to exercise its discretion to allow amendments. Such cases include where a new or inconsistent cause of action is introduced; where vested interests or accrued legal rights will be adversely affected; where prejudice or injustice which cannot be properly compensated in costs is occasioned to the other.”
6. Order 8 Rule 5(1) of the Civil Procedure Rules provides as follows:For the purpose of determining the real question in controversy between the parties, or of correcting any defect or error in any proceedings, the court may either of its own motion or on the application of any party order any document to be amended in such manner as it directs and on such terms as to costs or otherwise as are just.”
7. I have carefully looked at the proceedings vis-à-vis the amended memorandum of appeal and I am satisfied that the proposed amendments will assist the court to determine the real questions in controversy. In any event, directions on disposal of the appeal are yet to be issued, as such I find that no prejudice will be occasioned to the Respondent should the present application be allowed. The outcome is that the application dated 7/3/2024 is merited and it is hereby allowed with no orders as to costs.
8. The appellants shall file and serve their record of appeal and serve it upon the respondent within 30 days of this order. Upon the filing of that record the Deputy Registrar of this court shall call for the original court record for Malindi CMC Land Case Number 142 Of 2019 and attach it to this appeal and this appeal shall be listed on 13/11/2024 for issuance of directions as to hearing.
RULING DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT MALINDI VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL ON THIS 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024. MWANGI NJOROGEJUDGE, ELC, MALINDI.