[2021] KEELC 2895 (KLR)

[2021] KEELC 2895 (KLR)

The court found that the Plaintiff had established, on a balance of probabilities, that he was the rightful owner of Mavoko Town Block 3/3474, having been allocated the land by the 2nd Defendant and supported by documentary evidence including a membership card and a confirmation letter. The 1st Defendant, who was...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEELC 2895 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Muasa Kioko; Defendant: Cosmas Kaloki; Defendant: Lukenya Ranching & Farming Co-operative Society Limited; Defendant: Joseph Muasya
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Machakos
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 204 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Land and Property Suit / Judgment
Outcome
Plaintiff's suit allowed in full.
Judges
OA Angote
Legal Topics
Land Allocation Disputes, Title Fraud, Rectification of Register, Injunctive Relief
Source Language
en
Land and Property Land Allocation Disputes Title Fraud Rectification of Register Injunctive Relief

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Muasa Kioko

Plaintiff

Cosmas Kaloki

Defendant

Lukenya Ranching & Farming Co-operative Society Limited

Defendant

Joseph Muasya

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Land and Property Suit / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the Plaintiff is the rightful owner of Mavoko Town Block 3/3474.
  2. 2 Whether the title issued to the 1st Defendant was procured fraudulently or by misrepresentation.
  3. 3 Whether the register should be rectified to reflect the Plaintiff as the owner.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Plaintiff had established, on a balance of probabilities, that he was the rightful owner of Mavoko Town Block 3/3474, having been allocated the land by the 2nd Defendant and supported by documentary evidence including a membership card and a confirmation letter. The 1st Defendant, who was registered as proprietor, failed to appear or explain the process by which he obtained the title. The court applied Section 26(1) of the Land Registration Act, holding that the title in the 1st Defendant's name was procured fraudulently or by misrepresentation. Consequently, the court ordered rectification of the register to reflect the Plaintiff as owner, issued a permanent...

Court Disposition

Plaintiff's suit allowed in full.

Orders

  • Declaration that the Plaintiff is the rightful owner of Mavoko Town Block 3/3474.
  • Order directing the Lands Registrar, Machakos to cancel the name Cosmas Kaloki Musyoka in the register of Title No. Mavoko Town Block 3/3474 and replace it with Muasa Kioko.