[2004] KEHC 471 (KLR)
The court found that the 1st plaintiff was deceased at the time the suit was filed, as evidenced by the burial permit and the Assistant Chief's letter. The verifying affidavit was therefore false and contrary to Order 7 Rule 2, which requires that such an affidavit be sworn by a living person filing the suit. No...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2004] KEHC 471 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Mwasya Muoki Wavai; Plaintiff: Another; Defendant: Mutiso Mumo Kalai
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Machakos
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- ? 86 of 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Case / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
- Outcome
- suit struck out
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction, Verifying Affidavit, Abuse of Process, Party Substitution
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mwasya Muoki Wavai
Plaintiff
Another
Plaintiff
Mutiso Mumo Kalai
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the suit is incompetent due to the death of the 1st plaintiff prior to filing.
- 2 Whether the verifying affidavit is fraudulent as it was sworn in the name of a deceased person.
- 3 Whether the suit constitutes an abuse of court process.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the 1st plaintiff was deceased at the time the suit was filed, as evidenced by the burial permit and the Assistant Chief's letter. The verifying affidavit was therefore false and contrary to Order 7 Rule 2, which requires that such an affidavit be sworn by a living person filing the suit. No substitution of parties was sought, and the suit was filed by a non-existent person. As a result, the suit was incompetent and amounted to an abuse of court process. The court sustained the preliminary objection and struck out the suit with costs to the defendant.
Court Disposition
suit struck out
Orders
- The suit is struck out with costs to the defendant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
10 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MACHAKOS CIVIL CASE NO. 86 OF 2002MUASYA MUOKI WAVAI & ANOTHER…………..PLAINTIFFS
VESUS
MUTISO MUMO KALAI……………………………….DEFENDANT
R U L I N G At paragraph 7 of the defendants defence the defendants gave notice that they would raise a preliminary on the issue of jurisdiction. Notice of preliminary objection was filed on 24. 2.2003 to the effect that the suit is incompetent and an abuse of court process because the 1st plaintiff died on 22. 5.1997 as per letter from the chief and burial permit produced in court and that the verifying affidavit in support of the plaint is a fraud since it was sworn on 3. 7.2002 when the 1st plaintiff was long deceased.
The counsel for plaintiff was present for the hearing of the Preliminary Objection but claimed not to be prepared with a reply to the Preliminary Objection. He was given time by the court from 4. 12. 2003 till 11. 12. 2003. He never turned up on 11. 12. 2003. The court will rule on the Preliminary Objection without a response from the plaintiffs counsel.
A copy of a burial permit was produced by defendants counsel which indicates that Mwasya Mwoki Wavai the 1st plaintiff died on 23. 5.1997. Annexed to it is a letter from Assistant Chief’s Office Kaani sub-location stating that the 1st plaintiff was a resident of that area and is deceased as indicated in the burial permit. The plaintiffs counsel has offered on evidence to the contrary.
The verifying affidavit sworn on 3. 7.2002 when the suit was filed is false and contrary to provisions of order 7 Rule 2 which requires that a verifying affidavit must be sworn by a person filing the suit who must be alive. No substitution of parties has been sought. In any case by the time the suit was filed the 1st plaintiff was long dead. The court finds therefore that there is no suit before the court it having been filed by a non existent person and the verifying affidavit having been falsified. The Preliminary Objection is sustained and the suit is hereby struck out with costs to the defendants.
Dated, read and delivered at Machakos this 28th day of January , 2004.
R. WENDOH JUDGE