[2024] KECPT 211 (KLR)

[2024] KECPT 211 (KLR)

The Tribunal found that the claimant had produced sufficient documentary evidence, including a member statement prepared by the respondent and a notice of termination acknowledged by the respondent's date stamp, to prove his entitlement to a refund of Kshs. 163,634.34. The respondent failed to attend hearings, file...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KECPT 211 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Paul Kibui Muchene; Respondent: Comoco Sacco Society Limited
Court
Cooperative Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Tribunal Case 165/E073 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Tribunal Claim / Judgment
Outcome
Claim allowed in full.
Judges
BM Kimemia, B Sawe, F Lotuiya, P. Gichuki, M Chesikaw, PO Aol
Legal Topics
Sacco Member Refunds, Termination of Membership, Contractual Obligations
Source Language
en
Commercial and Corporate Sacco Member Refunds Termination of Membership Contractual Obligations

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Paul Kibui Muchene

Applicant

Comoco Sacco Society Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Tribunal Claim / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the claimant is entitled to a refund of Kshs. 163,634.34 from the respondent upon resignation from membership.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent received proper notice of termination of membership from the claimant.
  3. 3 Whether the respondent provided any evidence to rebut the claimant's claim.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the claimant had produced sufficient documentary evidence, including a member statement prepared by the respondent and a notice of termination acknowledged by the respondent's date stamp, to prove his entitlement to a refund of Kshs. 163,634.34. The respondent failed to attend hearings, file evidence, or otherwise rebut the claimant's case, relying solely on bare denials in its statement of defence. The Tribunal held that mere denial without evidence is insufficient to disprove a properly supported claim. Accordingly, the Tribunal concluded that the respondent owed the claimant the claimed sum and was liable to refund it together with costs and interest from the...

Court Disposition

Claim allowed in full.

Orders

  • The respondent shall refund Kshs. 163,634.34 to the claimant.
  • The respondent shall pay costs and interest from the date of filing the claim.