[2024] KEHC 100 (KLR)

[2024] KEHC 100 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant's bill of costs had been taxed and a Certificate of Costs issued for Kshs. 105,152/=. As the Certificate of Costs had not been set aside or stayed, and the application was unopposed, the court held that there was no legal impediment to entering judgment in favour of the applicant...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEHC 100 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Mucheru Law LLP Advocates; Respondent: Cementers Limited
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Application E1058 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Unopposed Application for Judgment on Taxed Costs
Outcome
application allowed; judgment entered for applicant for taxed costs
Judges
A Mabeya
Legal Topics
Taxation of Costs, Certificate of Costs, Advocate Client Disputes
Source Language
en
Commercial and Corporate Civil Procedure Taxation of Costs Certificate of Costs Advocate Client Disputes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mucheru Law LLP Advocates

Applicant

Cementers Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Unopposed Application for Judgment on Taxed Costs

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to judgment for the amount certified in the Certificate of Costs.
  2. 2 Whether there is any legal impediment to entering judgment where the Certificate of Costs has not been set aside or stayed.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant's bill of costs had been taxed and a Certificate of Costs issued for Kshs. 105,152/=. As the Certificate of Costs had not been set aside or stayed, and the application was unopposed, the court held that there was no legal impediment to entering judgment in favour of the applicant for the certified amount. The court relied on section 51(2) of the Advocates Act, which empowers the court to enter judgment for the sum certified in the Certificate of Costs where it has not been set aside or altered. Accordingly, the application was allowed as prayed.

Court Disposition

application allowed; judgment entered for applicant for taxed costs

Orders

  • Judgment is entered for the applicant against the respondent for Kshs. 105,152/=.
  • The respondent shall pay the applicant the sum of Kshs. 105,152/= together with costs.