[2023] KENET 1253 (KLR)

[2023] KENET 1253 (KLR)

The Tribunal determined that, since the appellant was self-represented, the Advocates Act and the Advocate (Remuneration) Order do not apply. Instead, the appellant is entitled to recover only actual, reasonable, and evidenced expenses incurred in the course of the proceedings. The Tribunal examined each item in the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KENET 1253 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Catherine Njoki Muchiri; Respondent: Ministerial Wildlife Conservation and Compensation Committee
Court
National Environment Tribunal - Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Tribunal Appeal 53 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Tribunal Appeal / Ruling on Taxation of Costs
Outcome
Bill of Costs taxed in favor of the appellant for Kshs. 34,400.
Judges
Emmanuel Mumia, Winnie Tsuma, Kariuki Muigua, Duncan Kuria, Ronald Allamano
Legal Topics
Costs Taxation, Self Represented Litigants, Wildlife Compensation, Bill of Costs
Source Language
en
Environmental Law Civil Procedure Costs Taxation Self Represented Litigants Wildlife Compensation Bill of Costs

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Catherine Njoki Muchiri

Appellant

Ministerial Wildlife Conservation and Compensation Committee

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Tribunal Appeal / Ruling on Taxation of Costs

  1. 1 Whether the appellant, as a self-represented litigant, is entitled to costs and the applicable basis for taxation.
  2. 2 Whether the items claimed in the Bill of Costs are reasonable and sufficiently supported by evidence.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal determined that, since the appellant was self-represented, the Advocates Act and the Advocate (Remuneration) Order do not apply. Instead, the appellant is entitled to recover only actual, reasonable, and evidenced expenses incurred in the course of the proceedings. The Tribunal examined each item in the Bill of Costs, found the claims for transport, accommodation, service, and paperwork to be reasonable and supported by documentation, and taxed them as prayed. The claim for compensation award interest was declined as it would be addressed in the final decree. The total sum of Kshs. 34,400 was allowed as costs in favor of the appellant.

Court Disposition

Bill of Costs taxed in favor of the appellant for Kshs. 34,400.

Orders

  • Compensation Award Interest taxed at Kshs. 0.
  • Travel and accommodation fees taxed at Kshs. 10,400.