[2022] KEELC 15235 (KLR)

[2022] KEELC 15235 (KLR)

The court found that the appellants had satisfied the requirements for grant of stay of execution pending appeal as set out in Order 42 rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010. The court held that eviction of the appellants prior to the determination of the appeal would result in substantial loss, and that the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEELC 15235 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Murefu Mudogo & 23 others; Respondent: Grace Vilegwa Chindia
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Kakamega
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment and Land Appeal E014 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Outcome
Application for stay of execution pending appeal allowed.
Judges
DO Ohungo
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Eviction Orders, Appeals Process, Security for Due Performance
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Stay of Execution Eviction Orders Appeals Process Security for Due Performance

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Murefu Mudogo & 23 others

Appellant

Grace Vilegwa Chindia

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the appellants have satisfied the conditions for grant of stay of execution pending appeal under Order 42 rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010.
  2. 2 Whether substantial loss would result to the appellants if stay is not granted.
  3. 3 Whether the application for stay was made without unreasonable delay.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the appellants had satisfied the requirements for grant of stay of execution pending appeal as set out in Order 42 rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010. The court held that eviction of the appellants prior to the determination of the appeal would result in substantial loss, and that the application for stay was made without unreasonable delay. The court further found that since the decree was not monetary except for costs, there was no justification to require security beyond what already existed. The court therefore granted a stay of execution of the judgment pending the hearing and determination of the appeal, with a warning that the stay may be vacated if the...

Court Disposition

Application for stay of execution pending appeal allowed.

Orders

  • Pending the hearing and determination of the appeal herein there be stay of execution of the judgment delivered on May 12, 2022 in Butali Senior Principal Magistrate’s Court ELC No 16 of 2021 (OS).
  • Costs of the application shall be in the appeal.