[2022] KEELC 15235 (KLR)
The court found that the appellants had satisfied the requirements for grant of stay of execution pending appeal as set out in Order 42 rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010. The court held that eviction of the appellants prior to the determination of the appeal would result in substantial loss, and that the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] KEELC 15235 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Murefu Mudogo & 23 others; Respondent: Grace Vilegwa Chindia
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Kakamega
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment and Land Appeal E014 of 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for stay of execution pending appeal allowed.
- Judges
- DO Ohungo
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Eviction Orders, Appeals Process, Security for Due Performance
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Murefu Mudogo & 23 others
Appellant
Grace Vilegwa Chindia
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellants have satisfied the conditions for grant of stay of execution pending appeal under Order 42 rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010.
- 2 Whether substantial loss would result to the appellants if stay is not granted.
- 3 Whether the application for stay was made without unreasonable delay.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the appellants had satisfied the requirements for grant of stay of execution pending appeal as set out in Order 42 rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010. The court held that eviction of the appellants prior to the determination of the appeal would result in substantial loss, and that the application for stay was made without unreasonable delay. The court further found that since the decree was not monetary except for costs, there was no justification to require security beyond what already existed. The court therefore granted a stay of execution of the judgment pending the hearing and determination of the appeal, with a warning that the stay may be vacated if the...
Court Disposition
Application for stay of execution pending appeal allowed.
Orders
- Pending the hearing and determination of the appeal herein there be stay of execution of the judgment delivered on May 12, 2022 in Butali Senior Principal Magistrate’s Court ELC No 16 of 2021 (OS).
- Costs of the application shall be in the appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
25 paragraphs
Mudogo & 23 others v Chindia (Environment and Land Appeal E014 of 2022) [2022] KEELC 15235 (KLR) (7 December 2022) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2022] KEELC 15235 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Environment and Land Court at Kakamega
Environment and Land Appeal E014 of 2022
DO Ohungo, J
December 7, 2022
Between
Murefu Mudogo & 23 others
Appellant
and
Grace Vilegwa Chindia
Respondent
Ruling
1. By Notice of Motion dated August 4, 2022, the appellants seek the following orders:1. [Spent]2. [Spent]3. [Spent]4. That pending the hearing and determination of the appeal herein there be stay of execution of the Senior Principal Court Judgment dated May 12, 2022 in Butali SPM ELC No 16 of 2021. 5.That such orders as shall meet the ends of justice be made in this (sic) circumstances.
6. That the cost of this application be provided for.
2. The application is supported by an affidavit sworn by the applicant who deposed that upon the subordinate court’s delivery of judgment in the respondent’s favour, the respondent extracted a decree and further obtained an order for security in readiness for eviction of the appellants from the suit property. The applicant therefore prayed that there be stay of execution pending the hearing and final determination of the appeal herein.
3. The respondent opposed the application through a replying affidavit in which she deposed that she has extracted the decree of court for eviction of the appellants and further that she also filed an ex parte application dated May 16, 2022 seeking police security during the eviction process and that the application was allowed by the subordinate court. She stated that the applicants do not have any tangible grounds for appeal and their application should be dismissed since they have engaged in unethical conduct by forum shopping.
4. The application was canvassed through written submissions. I have considered the application, the affidavits, and the parties’ submissions. The court’s jurisdiction to grant stay of execution pending appeal is guided by Order 42 rule 6 (1) and (2) of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010. An applicant seeking stay of execution pending appeal must demonstrate that substantial loss will result to him if stay is not granted, and that the application has been made without unreasonable delay. The applicant is further required to give such security as the court may order for the due performance of the decree. See Kenya Power & Lighting Co Ltd v Kigaita Ngare Unduthu & 36 others[2020] eKLR and Kenya Shell Limited v Benjamin Karuga Kibiru & another [1986] eKLR.
5. The parties tended to delve into the merits of the appeal. I have nevertheless striven to capture the salient issues while keeping within the principles applicable to an application for stay of execution pending appeal under Order 42 rule 6 (1) and (2) of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010. Consideration of the merits of the appeal is not one of the said principles.
6. The decree of the subordinate court is inter alia for eviction of the appellants. The respondent has indicated in the replying affidavit that she is intent on proceeding with eviction. An eviction prior to determination of this appeal will no doubt amount to substantial loss on the part of the appellants.
7. The subject judgment was delivered on May 12, 2022 while this appeal was filed on May 27, 2022. The application under consideration was filed on August 10, 2022, some three months after the appeal was filed. In the circumstances of the appeal, I do not consider a delay of three months to be unreasonable. Regarding the issue of security for the due performance of the decree, I note that the subject decree is not a monetary one save for the issue of costs. I see no valid reason to warrant monetarising the decree beyond what already exists. I will not impose any security but will compensate for its absence by giving directions to facilitate early hearing and determination of the appeal.
8. In view of the foregoing, I am persuaded that a case has been made for granting stay of execution pending hearing and determination of this appeal. The appellants are however warned that the stay orders may be vacated if they do not proactively prosecute this appeal.
9. In the result, I make the following orders:a.Pending the hearing and determination of the appeal herein there be stay of execution of the judgment delivered on May 12, 2022 in Butali Senior Principal Magistrate’s Court ELC No 16 of 2021 (OS).b.Costs of the application shall be in the appeal.
DATED, SIGNED, AND DELIVERED AT KAKAMEGA THIS 7TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2022. D. O. OHUNGOJUDGEDelivered in open court in the presence of:Mr Khayumbi for the appellantsMs Wanyonyi for the respondentCourt Assistant: E. Juma