[2017] KESC 28 (KLR)

[2017] KESC 28 (KLR)

The Supreme Court held that it has the jurisdiction and discretion to expunge documents from its record if they are found to be inadmissible or improperly obtained, particularly in the context of a presidential election petition where the integrity of the process and the rights of the parties must be balanced...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KESC 28 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Njonjo Mue; Applicant: Khelef Khalifa; Respondent: Chairperson of Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission; Respondent: Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission; Respondent: H. E. Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta; Respondent: National Super Alliance Coalition
Court
Supreme Court
Court Station
Supreme Court of Kenya
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Election Petition 4 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Election Petition / Ruling on Interlocutory Application to Strike Out Documents
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
DK Maraga, PM Mwilu, JB Ojwang, SC Wanjala, N Ndungu, I Lenaola
Legal Topics
Admissibility of Evidence, Expunging Documents From Record, Presidential Election Petitions
Source Language
en
Constitutional Law Election Petitions Admissibility of Evidence Expunging Documents From Record Presidential Election Petitions

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Njonjo Mue

Applicant

Khelef Khalifa

Applicant

Chairperson of Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission

Respondent

Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission

Respondent

H. E. Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta

Respondent

National Super Alliance Coalition

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Election Petition / Ruling on Interlocutory Application to Strike Out Documents

  1. 1 Whether the Supreme Court can expunge internal correspondences between members of the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission from the record in a presidential election petition.

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court held that it has the jurisdiction and discretion to expunge documents from its record if they are found to be inadmissible or improperly obtained, particularly in the context of a presidential election petition where the integrity of the process and the rights of the parties must be balanced against the need for a fair trial. The court found that the internal correspondences between members of the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission, as annexed to the affidavits of the petitioners, were not properly before the court and should be expunged. The court exercised its discretion to strike out the specified documents from the record, noting that the reasons for the...

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • The following documents are expunged from the record: (a) Internal memo dated September 5, 2017 from the 1st respondent to the Chief Executive Officer of IEBC marked NM-3 annexed to the affidavit of Njonjo Mue sworn on November 5, 2017; (b) Internal memo dated October 9, 2017 from a former commissioner of the 2nd...
  • There shall be no orders as to costs.