[2022] KEELC 13681 (KLR)

[2022] KEELC 13681 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had complied with the conditional stay order by depositing KES 700,000 as security, which was deemed sufficient to protect the respondent's interests pending appeal. The court emphasized that the main objective of a stay of execution is to preserve the subject matter during the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEELC 13681 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Gladys Kaluyu Mugambi; Respondent: Gedion Kabiki Kirera
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Isiolo
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment and Land Appeal E003 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Outcome
conditional stay of execution confirmed pending appeal
Judges
PM Njoroge
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Security for Costs, Appeals Process, Judgment Enforcement
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Stay of Execution Security for Costs Appeals Process Judgment Enforcement

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Gladys Kaluyu Mugambi

Applicant

Gedion Kabiki Kirera

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to a stay of execution of the judgment and decree issued on November 23, 2021 pending appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the security deposited by the applicant is sufficient to safeguard the respondent's interests.
  3. 3 Whether the appeal has overwhelming chances of success warranting the grant of stay.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had complied with the conditional stay order by depositing KES 700,000 as security, which was deemed sufficient to protect the respondent's interests pending appeal. The court emphasized that the main objective of a stay of execution is to preserve the subject matter during the pendency of an appeal. Since the appeal had not yet been admitted for hearing, the substantive issues raised by both parties would be addressed at the full hearing of the appeal. The court confirmed the stay of execution and directed the applicant to file a record of appeal within 30 days, with further directions to be issued at a later date. Costs of the application were ordered...

Court Disposition

conditional stay of execution confirmed pending appeal

Orders

  • The conditional stay granted to the applicant/appellant is confirmed; the sum of KES 700,000 already deposited with court as security shall be retained by the court pending hearing and determination of the intended appeal.
  • The applicant/appellant is directed to file a record of appeal within 30 days and properly serve it upon the respondent.