[2019] KEELC 81 (KLR)
The court found that the proposed amendments to the plaint were necessary to clarify the real issues in controversy and to ensure that the dispute was adjudicated on its merits. The application was made within reasonable time, and no prejudice to the defendants was demonstrated that could not be compensated by...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEELC 81 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Mugere Kamotho; Defendant: James Muchiri Ndegwa; Defendant: David Muthengi; Defendant: John Nyaga; Defendant: M’Imwitha M’Rinthira; Defendant: Jackson Makunyi Kururu; Defendant: M’Gweta Murua; Defendant: Njeru Ngoroi; Defendant: Alexander Munene Mati; Defendant: Patrick Mutugi Mati; Defendant: John Gitonga Mati; Defendant: Catherine Kagendo Muturia; Defendant: M’Nandi Maikithe
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Chuka
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 5 of 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Amend Plaint
- Outcome
- application allowed with conditions
- Legal Topics
- Amendment of Pleadings, Joinder of Parties, Service of Process
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mugere Kamotho
Plaintiff
James Muchiri Ndegwa
Defendant
David Muthengi
Defendant
John Nyaga
Defendant
M’Imwitha M’Rinthira
Defendant
Jackson Makunyi Kururu
Defendant
M’Gweta Murua
Defendant
Njeru Ngoroi
Defendant
Alexander Munene Mati
Defendant
Patrick Mutugi Mati
Defendant
John Gitonga Mati
Defendant
Catherine Kagendo Muturia
Defendant
M’Nandi Maikithe
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Amend Plaint
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff should be granted leave to amend the plaint to include a next friend and additional facts.
- 2 Whether the proposed amendments would prejudice the defendants.
- 3 Whether proper notice must be served on the Attorney General under the Government Proceedings Act.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the proposed amendments to the plaint were necessary to clarify the real issues in controversy and to ensure that the dispute was adjudicated on its merits. The application was made within reasonable time, and no prejudice to the defendants was demonstrated that could not be compensated by costs. However, the court recognized the statutory requirement to serve notice on the Attorney General under the Government Proceedings Act, given the intention to enjoin the Attorney General as a party. The court therefore allowed the application for amendment, subject to the plaintiff serving the Attorney General with notice and all suit papers within seven days, and directed all...
Court Disposition
application allowed with conditions
Orders
- Plaintiff granted leave to amend the plaint as per the draft annexed.
- Plaintiff to serve the Attorney General with notice of intention to enjoin and all suit papers within 7 days.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
56 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT
AT CHUKA
CHUKA ELC CASE NO. 05 OF 2019
FORMERLY CHUKA C.M’S CIVIL CASE NO. 114 OF 2018
MUGERE KAMOTHO............................................................PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
JAMES MUCHIRI NDEGWA.......................................1ST DEFENDANT
DAVID MUTHENGI......................................................2ND DEFENDANT
JOHN NYAGA................................................................3RD DEFENDANT
M’IMWITHA M’RINTHIRA.......................................4TH DEFENDANT
JACKSON MAKUNYI KURURU................................5TH DEFENDANT
M’GWETA MURUA......................................................6TH DEFENDANT
NJERU NGOROI...........................................................7TH DEFENDANT
ALEXANDER MUNENE MATI..................................8TH DEFENDANT
PATRICK MUTUGI MATI..........................................9TH DEFENDANT
JOHN GITONGA MATI............................................10TH DEFENDANT
CATHERINE KAGENDO MUTURIA.....................11TH DEFENDANT
M’NANDI MAIKITHE..............................................12TH DEFENDANT
RULING
1. This application is dated 29th July, 2019 and seeks the following orders:
a) That the applicant be granted leave to amend the plaint dated 3rd March, 2015 and as per the attached draft amended plaint.
b) That the amended plaint annexed hereto be treated as the plaintiff’s amended plaint and that the same be deemed as having been duly filed and served.
c) That the costs of the application be in the cause.
2. The application is supported by the affidavit of Ambani Beverlyne Loice sworn on 18. 7.2019 which states:
I, Ambani Beverlyne Loice of P. O. Box 55623-00200, Nairobi, do hereby make oath and state as follows:-
1. That I am an advocate of the High Court of Kenya, practicing as such in the firm of Kaminza & Ambani Advocates representing the plaintiff herein.
2. That I am seized and have conduct of this matter on behalf of the plaintiff hence competent to swear this affidavit.
3. That after the firm of Kaminza & Ambani Advocates was appointed by the plaintiff to take over conduct of this matter on his behalf, I realized that there was need to amend the plaint to include Mr. Alphan Muthami Gilbert as a next of friend to the plaintiff pursuant to leave granted on 8th July, 2019.
4. Further, I realized there was need to amend the plaint to include crucial matters of fact which were not pleaded.
5. That in the circumstances, it is necessary for the plaintiff to amend his plaint.
6. That the proposed amendments are meant to lay bare the real questions in controversy and ensure that the dispute is adjudicated upon on its true and substantive merits.
7. That the amendment will enable the matter at hand to be effectively and effectually determined by this honourable court.
8. That in the circumstances the proposed amendments do not occasion prejudice upon the defendants herein in any way and/or manner herein which cannot be compensated by way of costs.
9. That this application has been filed within reasonable time.
10. That it is the interest of justice and fairness that the applicant should be granted leave to amend its plaint filed herein as per the annexed draft amended plaint. I mark “A” and annex hereto a copy of the draft amended plaint.
11. That what is deponed to herein is true to the best of my information, knowledge and/or belief save as to information whose sources have been disclosed.
3. The application has the following grounds:
1. That the applicant is desirous of amending its plaint and dated 3rd March, 2015 as presently on record to include Mr. Alphan Muthami Gilbert as a next of friend to the plaintiff and to lay bare crucial facts which will aid the court in determining the issues controversy (sic) in the suit herein.
2. That the proposed amendments are meant to lay bare the real questions in controversy and ensure that the dispute is adjudicated upon on its true and substantive merits.
3. That the amendment will enable the matter at hand to be effectively and effectually determined by this honorable court.
4. That the defendants shall not suffer any prejudice from the proposed amendments.
5. That this application has been filed within reasonable time.
6. That it is in the interest of justice and fairness that the applicant should be granted leave to amend his plaint filed herein.
4. When the application was heard interpartes on 4. 12. 2020, Mr. I.C. Mugo raised the issue of if or if not the plaintiff had served notice upon the Attorney General in terms of the provisions of the Government Proceedings Act.
5. Mr. Kaminza told the court that he would serve the Attorney General and give notice as required by the law.
6. To facilitate expeditious disposal of this suit, this application is hereby allowed. The plaintiff is directed to serve the Attorney General of his intention to enjoin him in this suit and also serve him with all suit papers within the next 7 days.
7. All parties are directed to comply with order 11 CPR, within the next 30 days.
8. The suit will be heard on 27th January, 2019.
9. It is so ordered.
Delivered in open Court at Chuka this 4th day of December, 2019 in the presence of:
CA: Ndegwa
Kaminza for the Plaintiff
IC Mugo for the Defendants
P. M. NJOROGE,
JUDGE.