[2023] KECPT 1032 (KLR)
The Tribunal found that the respondent's bill of costs was properly presented for taxation and, in the absence of any opposition or evidence to the contrary from the claimant, proceeded to assess the items claimed. Instruction fees were allowed at Kshs. 58,800/= as per the scale. Attendance fees were allowed for...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KECPT 1032 (KLR)
- Parties
- Claimant: Nelson Njururi Mugo; Respondent: Mungania Tea Growers Sacco Ltd
- Court
- Cooperative Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Tribunal Case 47 of 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Bill of Costs / Taxation Ruling
- Outcome
- bill of costs taxed and allowed
- Judges
- BM Kimemia, J. Mwatsama, B Sawe, F Lotuiya, P. Gichuki, PO Aol
- Legal Topics
- Costs Taxation, Advocate Remuneration, Bill of Costs, Cooperative Tribunal Procedure
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nelson Njururi Mugo
Claimant
Mungania Tea Growers Sacco Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Bill of Costs / Taxation Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent's bill of costs is properly drawn and should be taxed as presented.
- 2 Whether the items claimed are supported by evidence and allowable under the Advocate Remuneration Order.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the respondent's bill of costs was properly presented for taxation and, in the absence of any opposition or evidence to the contrary from the claimant, proceeded to assess the items claimed. Instruction fees were allowed at Kshs. 58,800/= as per the scale. Attendance fees were allowed for specific items totaling Kshs. 7,800/=. Disbursements for items 11 to 15 were allowed at Kshs. 435/=. Items that were either included within other allowed items or unsupported by receipts were taxed off at NIL. The total bill of costs was therefore taxed and allowed at Kshs. 67,035/=.
Court Disposition
bill of costs taxed and allowed
Orders
- The respondent's bill of costs dated 23.7.2020 is taxed and allowed at Kshs. 67,035/=
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
18 paragraphs
Mugo v Mungania Tea Growers Sacco Ltd (Tribunal Case 47 of 2011) [2023] KECPT 1032 (KLR) (30 November 2023) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2023] KECPT 1032 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Cooperative Tribunal
Tribunal Case 47 of 2011
BM Kimemia, Chair, J. Mwatsama, Vice Chair, B Sawe, F Lotuiya, P. Gichuki & PO Aol, Members
November 30, 2023
Between
Nelson Njururi Mugo
Claimant
and
Mungania Tea Growers Sacco Ltd
Respondent
Ruling
1. The matter for determination is Respondent’s Bill of Cost dated 23. 7.2020. There was no response filed by the Claimant.
2. The same is taxed vide the provisions of Schedule II Advocate Remuneration Order.1. Items on Instructions Fees assessed at Kshs. 58,800/=.2. Items 2,3,and 10 are included in item 1 of Instructions Fees hence taxed off at NIL.3. Items on Attendance 4,6,and 8 at Kshs. 2100/= each total Kshs. 6300/= and items 10,17 and 18 at Kshs. 500/= total Kshs. 1500/= total Kshs. 7800/=.4. For the Transport and Subsistence items 5, 7 and 9 are included in items 4, 6 and 8 and there are no receipts filed as proof hence taxed at NIL.5. Items 11,12,13,14, and 15 are allowed as prayed total Kshs. 435/=
3. We therefore find that the Bill of Cost is taxed at Kshs. 67,035/=
RULING SIGNED, DATED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY AT NAIROBI THIS 30TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2023. HON. BEATRICE KIMEMIA - CHAIRPERSON SIGNED 30. 11. 2023HON. J. MWATSAMA - DEPUTY CHAIRPERSON SIGNED 30. 11. 2023HON. BEATRICE SAWE - MEMBER SIGNED 30. 11. 2023HON. FRIDAH LOTUIYA - MEMBER SIGNED 30. 11. 2023HON. PHILIP GICHUKI - MEMBER SIGNED 30. 11. 2023HON. PAUL AOL - MEMBER SIGNED 30. 11. 2023TRIBUNAL CLERK - JONAHMs. Ndugu holding brief for Ariithi advocate for the RespondentNelson Mugo – No appearanceMugambi Njeru advocate for Claimant- No appearanceHON. J. MWATSAMA - DEPUTY CHAIRPERSON SIGNED 30. 11. 2023