[2024] KEELC 380 (KLR)

[2024] KEELC 380 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant failed to comply with directions to serve and file submissions, indicating a lack of interest in prosecuting the application. Additionally, the orders sought were already the subject of a similar application in Busia CMC Misc Application No E04 of 2022, rendering the present...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEELC 380 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Zakaria Mwaniki Mugwe; Respondent: Benard Ojwang; Respondent: Susan Ayite Owang; Respondent: Sharon Ojwang; Respondent: Philice Ojwang; Respondent: Dibora Ojwang
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Busia
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment and Land Miscellaneous Application E005 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Notice of Motion to Strike Out Application
Outcome
application struck out with costs
Judges
BN Olao
Legal Topics
Striking Out Application, Service of Process, Stay of Execution, Leave to File Reference
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Striking Out Application Service of Process Stay of Execution Leave to File Reference

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Zakaria Mwaniki Mugwe

Applicant

Benard Ojwang

Respondent

Susan Ayite Owang

Respondent

Sharon Ojwang

Respondent

Philice Ojwang

Respondent

Dibora Ojwang

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Notice of Motion to Strike Out Application

  1. 1 Whether the applicant complied with court directions regarding service and filing of submissions.
  2. 2 Whether the application was rendered moot by a similar order already granted in a previous matter.
  3. 3 Whether the applicant complied with the Advocate Remuneration Order in seeking leave to file a reference.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant failed to comply with directions to serve and file submissions, indicating a lack of interest in prosecuting the application. Additionally, the orders sought were already the subject of a similar application in Busia CMC Misc Application No E04 of 2022, rendering the present application moot. The applicant also failed to comply with the procedural requirements under the Advocate Remuneration Order for seeking leave to file a reference, as the Bill of Costs was not annexed and there was no evidence of compliance with paragraph 11(1) and (2). Consequently, the Notice of Motion dated 14th June 2023 was struck out with costs to the 1st Interested Party.

Court Disposition

application struck out with costs

Orders

  • The Notice of Motion dated 14th June 2023 is struck out.
  • Costs awarded to the 1st Interested Party.