[2002] KEHC 695 (KLR)

[2002] KEHC 695 (KLR)

The court held that the taxing master must provide reasons for the decision to tax item no. 8 of the bill of costs, as required by Rule 11 of the Advocates Act. Without such reasons, the judge cannot properly review whether the taxing master's discretion was exercised judicially. The file is therefore returned to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2002] KEHC 695 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Ahmed Abeid Said; Applicant: Muhandis Abeid Said; Respondent: S.S. Nurani
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 301 of 1997
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Objection to Taxation of Bill of Costs
Outcome
File returned to taxing master to record reasons for taxation of disputed item; limited stay granted on disputed amount.
Legal Topics
Taxation of Costs, Review of Taxing Master Decision, Judicial Discretion in Costs
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Taxation of Costs Review of Taxing Master Decision Judicial Discretion in Costs

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ahmed Abeid Said

Applicant

Muhandis Abeid Said

Applicant

S.S. Nurani

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Case / Ruling on Objection to Taxation of Bill of Costs

  1. 1 Whether the taxing master erred in taxing item no. 8 of the bill of costs when the suit did not proceed to hearing.
  2. 2 Whether the court should interfere with the taxing master's discretion in taxing the disputed item.
  3. 3 Whether reasons for the taxation decision were properly provided as required by law.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the taxing master must provide reasons for the decision to tax item no. 8 of the bill of costs, as required by Rule 11 of the Advocates Act. Without such reasons, the judge cannot properly review whether the taxing master's discretion was exercised judicially. The file is therefore returned to the taxing master to record reasons for allowing the disputed item, after which the matter will be reconsidered by the judge. No stay is granted for the undisputed amount; the stay is limited to the disputed sum of KES 35,000.

Court Disposition

File returned to taxing master to record reasons for taxation of disputed item; limited stay granted on disputed amount.

Orders

  • The file shall be placed before the taxing master to record reasons for taxing the disputed item.
  • The matter will then be placed before the judge in chambers for consideration as to whether discretion was exercised judicially.