[2022] KEELRC 12851 (KLR)
The court found that the proposed amendment to the memorandum of claim was neither malicious nor bad in law. The claims in the draft amended statement remain allegations subject to proof at trial. The court emphasized that amendments should be allowed to facilitate the determination of real issues in controversy,...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] KEELRC 12851 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Grace Muhatia; Respondent: Lions School
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Eldoret
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause E027 of 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Cause / Ruling on Application to Amend Memorandum of Claim
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Judges
- NJ Abuodha
- Legal Topics
- Amendment of Pleadings, Leave to Amend, Procedural Fairness
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Grace Muhatia
Applicant
Lions School
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Cause / Ruling on Application to Amend Memorandum of Claim
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant should be granted leave to amend the memorandum of claim.
- 2 Whether the proposed amendment would prejudice the respondent or is otherwise improper.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the proposed amendment to the memorandum of claim was neither malicious nor bad in law. The claims in the draft amended statement remain allegations subject to proof at trial. The court emphasized that amendments should be allowed to facilitate the determination of real issues in controversy, provided no prejudice is occasioned to the other party that cannot be compensated by costs. The respondent's objections were not substantiated, and the application was not brought too late. Therefore, the court exercised its discretion to allow the amendment, ensuring both parties have the opportunity to present their cases fully.
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- The application dated 10th March, 2022 is allowed.
- The draft amended memorandum of claim is deemed duly filed and served upon payment of requisite court fees.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
25 paragraphs
Muhatia v Lions School (Cause E027 of 2021) [2022] KEELRC 12851 (KLR) (14 October 2022) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2022] KEELRC 12851 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Employment and Labour Relations at Eldoret
Cause E027 of 2021
NJ Abuodha, J
October 14, 2022
Between
Grace Muhatia
Claimant
and
Lions School
Respondent
Ruling
1. Before me is an application dated 10th March, 2022 seeking leave to amend the memorandum of claim.
2. The application was supported by the affidavit of the claimant/applicant who stated on the main that after discussion with her counsel on record, she was informed that she had not captured the respondent correctly and that there were certain particulars which had not been included and some prayers were omitted.
3. The respondent opposed the application and filed a Replying affidavit through one Gurnam Singh Sabharwal who stated among others that the application was brought in bad faith, orchestrated by malice and with sole intention of unjust enrichment.
4. The respondent further stated that the application was totally defective, unimportant and bad in law.
5. As was held by the Court of Appeal in the case of CBK v Trust Bank Ltd [2002] 2EA 365 that an amendment of pleading and joinder of parties was aimed at allowing a litigant to plead the whole of the claim he was entitled to make in respect of his cause of action and that a party should always be allowed to make such amendments as are necessary for determining the real issues in controversy or avoiding a multiplicity of suits.
6. In other words, an amendment will always be allowed at any stage in the pleadings provided they are not initiated too late and no injustice or prejudice would be occasioned to the other side incapable of being properly compensated for by an award of costs.
7. The Court has reviewed and considered the draft amended statement of claim and sees nothing malicious or bad in law about it. The respondent has complained that the claimant/applicant is motivated by unjust enrichment however it should be noted that the claims contained in the draft amended statement of claim remain mere allegations subject to proof at the trial.
8. From the foregoing the Court allows the application dated 10th March, 2022 and hereby deems the draft amended memorandum of claim attached to the application, duly filed and served upon payment of requisite court fees.
9. The respondent shall have corresponding leave to amend and serve their statements of response if necessary, within 14 days of this ruling. The matter is hereby set for mention on 14th November, 2022 for directions on hearing and disposal. Costs in the cause.
10. It is so ordered
DATED AND DELIVERED AT ELDORET THIS 14TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2022ABUODHA NELSON JORUMJUDGE ELRC