[1984] KECA 88 (KLR)
The Court held that medical evidence is not necessary to sustain a conviction for indecent assault where the complainant's testimony is credible and unshaken. The appellant's claim of consent and friendship with the complainant, who was twelve years old, does not constitute a defence under Section 144(1) of the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1984] KECA 88 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Muita Thumi; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Court Station
- Court of Appeal at Nakuru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 36 of 1984
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Indecent Assault, Sexual Offences Against Children, Consent in Criminal Law, Sentencing Principles
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Muita Thumi
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the conviction for indecent assault was supported by sufficient evidence in the absence of medical evidence.
- 2 Whether consent or friendship is a valid defence to a charge of indecent assault on a girl under fourteen years.
- 3 Whether the sentence imposed was lawful and excessive.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that medical evidence is not necessary to sustain a conviction for indecent assault where the complainant's testimony is credible and unshaken. The appellant's claim of consent and friendship with the complainant, who was twelve years old, does not constitute a defence under Section 144(1) of the Penal Code, as the law expressly excludes consent as a defence for victims under fourteen. The sentence imposed, though at the statutory maximum, was justified by the gravity of the offence and the vulnerability of the victim. The appeal was therefore dismissed as lacking merit both on conviction and sentence.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
- The conviction and sentence are upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
29 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL
AT NAKURU
(Coram: Kneller, J A, Chesoni and Nyarangi Ag JJ A)
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 36 OF 1984
BETWEEN
MUITA THUMI ………………………………………… APPELLANT
AND
REPUBLIC ………………………………………………. RESPONDENT
(Appeal from an order of the High Court of Kenya at Nakuru (Masime J)
dated 10th October 1983 IN
Criminal Appeal No 196 of 1983
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
Muita Thumi, the appellant, was convicted of indecent assault on a female contrary to Section144(1) of the Penal Code and sentenced to five years’ imprisonment with hard labour and twelve strokes of corporal punishment. He appealed to the High Court against conviction and sentence on the grounds that, H.W (PW1) and R.W (PW2) lied to the court when they said that, when they responded to the complainant’s cry for help they stood outside the appellant’s house; there was no medical evidence of rape; there was no medical evidence to prove the charge of indecent assault; he was not allowed to defend himself; the trial court did not consider the fact that had it been true that he committed rape, the matter would have been reported immediately and the sentence is long. Masime J dismissed the appeal summarily under Section 352(2), but the appellant has not complained about the order for summary rejection in his appeal to this Court. The grounds that related to rape were irrelevant as the appellant was not convicted of rape. Reading all the grounds of appeal in the High Court one may summarize them into two. First, there was no medical evidence to support the conviction and secondly the sentence is excessive. The first ground can be described as attacking the conviction on the ground that it was against the weight of the evidence on record. Indeed, medical evidence is not necessary to convict on the charge the appellant faced.
In the appeal before us, the appellant argued that the trial magistrate did not consider the fact that, he told the Court that the complainant consented to his indecently assaulting her and the complainant was his friend. The last ground of appeal is on the sentence. At his trial the appellant told the Court, in his unsworn statement, that they had played peaceful sex and the complainant was his girlfriend. The complainant told the Court that she was 12 years old. Subject to the proviso to Section 144(1), which was not raised, it is no defence to a charge of indecent assault on a girl under age of fourteen years to prove that she consented to the act of indecency. Even if the appellant had proved consent by the complainant, which he did not, that would not have afforded him a defence, in as much as friendship could not be a defence to the charge. The appellant was correctly convicted.
The sentence is lawful and though the term of imprisonment is the maximum under the section it was merited for the appellant’s barbaric act on a female child of twelve years. There is no merit in the appeal which we order to be dismissed.
Dated and delivered at Nakuru this of September 24 1984.
A A KNELLER
…………………………………..
JUDGE OF APPEAL
Z R CHESONI
………………………………….
AG JUDGE OF APPEAL
J O NYARANGI
………………………………….
AG JUDGE OF APPEAL
I certify that this is a true copy of the original.
………………………………….
DEPUTY REGISTRAR