[2025] KEBPRT 305 (KLR)
The Tribunal found that the Applicants had established, on a balance of probabilities, the existence of a landlord-tenant relationship with the Respondents, as evidenced by rent payments, Respondents' admissions, and lack of any statutory notice to alter or terminate the tenancy. The Respondents' actions in blocking access and demolishing the perimeter fence were in breach of the Landlord and Tenant (Shops, Hotels and Catering Establishments) Act, as no proper notice was issued and statutory procedures were not followed. While the Applicants failed to strictly prove the value of lost items and improvements with receipts, the Tribunal accepted their consistent evidence and the...
- Citation
- [2025] KEBPRT 305 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Aineah Anwa Mukabane; Applicant: Patrick Ndingro; Applicant: Joanes Ochieng Olunya; Respondent: Naftary Maina; Respondent: Mwangi Maina; Respondent: Ivory Homes Care Limited
- Court
- Business Premises Rent Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 17 June 2025
- Case Number
- Tribunal Case E020 of 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Tribunal Reference / Judgment
- Outcome
- Applicants' reference allowed in part; compensation for lost items awarded; claim for improvements dismissed; costs to Applicants.
- Judges
- N Wahome, Joyce Murigi
- Legal Topics
- Controlled Tenancy, Landlord Tenant Disputes, Quiet Possession, Special Damages, Compensation for Loss, Procedural Compliance
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Aineah Anwa Mukabane
Applicant
Patrick Ndingro
Applicant
Joanes Ochieng Olunya
Applicant
Naftary Maina
Respondent
Mwangi Maina
Respondent
Ivory Homes Care Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Tribunal Reference / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Applicants have proved the existence of a landlord-tenant relationship on a balance of probabilities.
- 2 Whether the Applicants are entitled to compensation for lost items and improvements after alleged illegal demolition and eviction.
- 3 Whether the Respondents complied with statutory requirements for altering or terminating a controlled tenancy under Cap 301.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the Applicants had established, on a balance of probabilities, the existence of a landlord-tenant relationship with the Respondents, as evidenced by rent payments, Respondents' admissions, and lack of any statutory notice to alter or terminate the tenancy. The Respondents' actions in blocking access and demolishing the perimeter fence were in breach of the Landlord and Tenant (Shops, Hotels and Catering Establishments) Act, as no proper notice was issued and statutory procedures were not followed. While the Applicants failed to strictly prove the value of lost items and improvements with receipts, the Tribunal accepted their consistent evidence and the...
Court Disposition
Applicants' reference allowed in part; compensation for lost items awarded; claim for improvements dismissed; costs to Applicants.
Orders
- Applicants shall be allowed complete quiet possession of the demised premises situate on Chiriku lane within Gikomba Market in Nairobi City.
- Applicants are awarded compensation at Kshs. 100,000 for lost/stolen tools of trade.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment