[2023] KEHC 25988 (KLR)
The court found that the applicants had established a prima facie case with a likelihood of success by demonstrating that the constitution of the Community Project Management Committee (CPMC) was conducted without adherence to constitutional and statutory requirements for public participation, equality, and...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEHC 25988 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Abdullahi Muktar; Applicant: Abdullahi Abdiwahab; Respondent: National Project Coordinator, Kenya Development Response to Displacement Impacts Project; Respondent: County Project Coordinator, Kenya Development Response to Displacement Impacts Project; Respondent: The Hon. Attorney General; Interested Party: Abdikadir Duqow Mohamood; Interested Party: Yussuf Hassan Mohamoud; Interested Party: Siyada Noor Buress
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Garissa
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 17 November 2023
- Case Number
- Constitutional Petition E014 of 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Conservatory Orders
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Judges
- JN Onyiego
- Legal Topics
- Public Participation, Equality and Non Discrimination, Leadership and Integrity, Judicial Review of Administrative Action
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Abdullahi Muktar
Applicant
Abdullahi Abdiwahab
Applicant
National Project Coordinator, Kenya Development Response to Displacement Impacts Project
Respondent
County Project Coordinator, Kenya Development Response to Displacement Impacts Project
Respondent
The Hon. Attorney General
Respondent
Abdikadir Duqow Mohamood
Interested Party
Yussuf Hassan Mohamoud
Interested Party
Siyada Noor Buress
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Conservatory Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the constitution of the Community Project Management Committee (CPMC) violated constitutional and statutory requirements for public participation, equality, and integrity.
- 2 Whether the applicants established a prima facie case warranting the grant of conservatory orders.
- 3 Whether the exhaustion doctrine and constitutional avoidance preclude the court from granting interim relief.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants had established a prima facie case with a likelihood of success by demonstrating that the constitution of the Community Project Management Committee (CPMC) was conducted without adherence to constitutional and statutory requirements for public participation, equality, and integrity. The court held that the issues raised were not frivolous and that there was imminent risk of infringement of the applicants' rights if conservatory orders were not granted. The court further determined that denial of the orders would not enhance constitutional values and that the substratum of the petition could be rendered nugatory without interim protection. The court was...
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- A conservatory order is issued restraining and staying the 1st and 2nd respondents, their agents, officers or any persons acting under their instructions from releasing monies to the accounts of the Community Project Management Committee and from dealing with the said committee in any way pending the hearing and...
- A conservatory order is issued staying, stopping, and freezing the 1st and 2nd respondents from proceeding with the tendering process for the project pending the hearing and determination of the petition.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment