[2024] KEELRC 2520 (KLR)
The court found that the existence of two different judgments delivered by the same magistrate in the same suit rendered the appellate process untenable and procedurally irregular. The rules of procedure do not envisage an appeal against two judgments in one suit, and the court declined to inquire into the reasons...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEELRC 2520 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Muky’s Importers Limited; Respondent: Nyanje Suleiman Gwende
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Mombasa
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Employment and Labour Relations Appeal E019 of 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Employment and Labour Relations Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal disposed of by setting aside both judgments and ordering a retrial.
- Judges
- AK Nzei
- Legal Topics
- Appeal Procedure, Judgment Irregularity, Retrial Orders
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Muky’s Importers Limited
Appellant
Nyanje Suleiman Gwende
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment and Labour Relations Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an appeal can properly lie against two different judgments delivered in the same suit by the same trial court.
- 2 Whether the existence of two judgments in the same suit invalidates the appellate process.
- 3 What orders are appropriate where two conflicting judgments exist in the same matter.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the existence of two different judgments delivered by the same magistrate in the same suit rendered the appellate process untenable and procedurally irregular. The rules of procedure do not envisage an appeal against two judgments in one suit, and the court declined to inquire into the reasons for the irregularity. In the interest of justice and to preserve the integrity of the judicial process, both judgments were set aside and a retrial ordered before a different magistrate. Each party was ordered to bear its own costs of the appeal.
Court Disposition
Appeal disposed of by setting aside both judgments and ordering a retrial.
Orders
- Both judgments of Hon. Lesootia Saitabau, Principal Magistrate, dated/delivered on 11th February 2022 and 15th March 2023 in Mombasa Chief Magistrate’s Court Employment Cause No. 990 of 2019 are set aside.
- A retrial is ordered in Mombasa Chief Magistrate’s Court Employment Cause No. 990 of 2019 before a magistrate other than Hon. Lesootia Saitabau.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
21 paragraphs
Muky’s Importers Limited v Gwende (Employment and Labour Relations Appeal E019 of 2022) [2024] KEELRC 2520 (KLR) (18 October 2024) (Judgment)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEELRC 2520 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Mombasa
Employment and Labour Relations Appeal E019 of 2022
AK Nzei, J
October 18, 2024
Between
Muky’s Importers Limited
Appellant
and
Nyanje Suleiman Gwende
Respondent
Judgment
1. The Appeal herein was instituted on 19th March 2022 vide a Memorandum of Appeal dated 1st March 2022. The appeal was at that point in time expressed to be against the Judgment of Hon. Lesootia Saitabau (Mr.), Principal Magistrate, delivered on 11th February 2022 in Mombasa CMC Employment Cause No. 990 of 2019.
2. On 22nd February 2024, the Appellant filed an Amended Memorandum of Appeal dated 20th February 2024 on which the appeal herein is shown to be:-“Against the Judgment of the Learned Hon. Lesootia Saitabau (PM) delivered at Mombasa on the 11th February 2022 in Employment Cause No. 990 of 2019 (Mombasa), and against the Judgment of the Learned Hon. Magistrate, Mr. Lesootia Saitabau (PM) signed on 15th February 2023 and delivered on 8th March 2023 in the same case.”
3. The Appellant filed a record of appeal on 22nd February 20224, and sure enough, the said record contained two different Judgments by the trial Magistrate, on Mombasa Chief Magistrate’s Court Employment Cause No. 990 of 2019:-a.A Judgment delivered on 11th February 2022 awarding the Claimant in the said suit a total of Kshs.728,662. 46/=, costs of the suit and interest at court rates.b.A Judgment signed on 15th February 2023 awarding the claimant in the said suit a total of Kshs.353,689. 20/=, costs of the suit and interest.
4. The Appellant herein, who was the Respondent in the aforesaid suit, has appealed against the said two Judgments.
5. This court’s Rules of Procedure do not envision a situation where this court sits to determine an appeal against two Judgments of a subordinate court arising from one suit. The issue of how and why a trial Magistrate wrote and delivered two different Judgments on the same suit, pursuant to a trial thereon, is not before me, and it is not for this court to enquire into such an issue. It has not escaped my attention that the two Judgments were delivered a year apart. Just what happened here.”
6. It is clear from the foregoing that there is no proper appeal before me. The following are the orders that recommend themselves to me, in the interest of Justice:-a.The two Judgments of the Hon. Lesootia Saitabau, Principal Magistrate, dated/delivered on 11th February 2022 and 15th March 2023 respectively in Mombasa Chief Magistrate’s Court Employment Cause No. 990 of 2019 are hereby set aside.b.There shall be a retrial in Mombasa Chief Magistrate’s Court Employment Cause No. 990 of 2019 before a Magistrate other than Hon. Lesootia Saitabau, Principle Magistrate.c.The retrial shall be conducted on priority basis.d.Each party shall bear its own Costs of the Appeal.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBI THIS 8TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2024AGNES KITIKU NZEIJUDGEOrderThis Judgement has been delivered via Microsoft Teams Online Platform. A signed copy will be availed to each party upon payment of the applicable Court fees.AGNES KITIKU NZEIJUDGEAppearance:........................Appellant........................Respondent