[2024] KECPT 1162 (KLR)

[2024] KECPT 1162 (KLR)

The Tribunal found that the Claimant had properly withdrawn his membership from the Respondent Sacco and provided sufficient notice as required by the Sacco's by-laws. The Claimant's member statement showed a deposit balance of Kshs. 132,000 with no debits since 2017, and there was no evidence that he owed any money...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KECPT 1162 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Jackson Mutua Mulinge; Respondent: Kencom Co-operative Savings and Credit Society Limited
Court
Cooperative Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Tribunal Case 130 (E177) of 2024
Procedural Posture
Tribunal Claim / Judgment
Outcome
judgment_for_claimant
Judges
BM Kimemia, J. Mwatsama, B Sawe, F Lotuiya, P. Gichuki, M Chesikaw, PO Aol
Legal Topics
Sacco Deposit Refund, Membership Withdrawal, Guarantor Liability, Contractual Obligations
Source Language
en
Commercial and Corporate Sacco Deposit Refund Membership Withdrawal Guarantor Liability Contractual Obligations

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jackson Mutua Mulinge

Applicant

Kencom Co-operative Savings and Credit Society Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Tribunal Claim / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the Claimant is entitled to a refund of his deposits held by the Respondent upon withdrawal of membership.
  2. 2 Whether the Respondent has provided any lawful justification for withholding the Claimant's deposits.
  3. 3 Whether the Claimant had any outstanding liabilities or was a guarantor for any member at the time of withdrawal.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the Claimant had properly withdrawn his membership from the Respondent Sacco and provided sufficient notice as required by the Sacco's by-laws. The Claimant's member statement showed a deposit balance of Kshs. 132,000 with no debits since 2017, and there was no evidence that he owed any money or was a guarantor for any member. The Respondent failed to attend Tribunal proceedings, did not file written submissions, and did not provide any evidence to support their defence or to justify withholding the Claimant's deposits. The Tribunal held that the Claimant was entitled to a refund of his deposits, with interest and costs, as the Respondent had no lawful basis to...

Court Disposition

judgment_for_claimant

Orders

  • The Respondent shall refund Kshs. 132,000 to the Claimant being the Claimant's deposit.
  • The Respondent shall pay interest at the Tribunal's rate from the date of filing until payment in full.