[2023] KEELRC 606 (KLR)

[2023] KEELRC 606 (KLR)

The court found that since the respondent did not oppose the application and in light of the procedural rules allowing for the filing of supplementary documents after the close of pleadings, it was appropriate to grant the claimant leave to file the 2007/2008 DPM circular. The court was persuaded that the admission...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEELRC 606 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Catherine Wambui Mungai & 7 others; Respondent: The Board of Governors Alliance High School
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 476 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to File Supplementary Documents
Outcome
application granted
Judges
AN Mwaure
Legal Topics
Admission of Further Evidence, Supplementary Documents, Procedure for Filing Documents
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Admission of Further Evidence Supplementary Documents Procedure for Filing Documents

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Catherine Wambui Mungai & 7 others

Applicant

The Board of Governors Alliance High School

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to File Supplementary Documents

  1. 1 Whether the claimant should be granted leave to file a supplementary list of documents comprising the 2007/2008 DPM circular.
  2. 2 Whether the admission of the new document would prejudice the respondent.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that since the respondent did not oppose the application and in light of the procedural rules allowing for the filing of supplementary documents after the close of pleadings, it was appropriate to grant the claimant leave to file the 2007/2008 DPM circular. The court was persuaded that the admission of the document would not prejudice the respondent, especially as the case was still ongoing. The court also considered the constitutional and statutory imperatives to avoid undue technicalities and to use technology to facilitate justice, particularly in the context of COVID-19 restrictions. Accordingly, the claimant was granted leave to file the supplementary document within...

Court Disposition

application granted

Orders

  • The claimant is granted leave to file a supplementary list of documents comprising the 2007/2008 DPM circular.
  • The supplementary documents must be filed and served on the court and the respondent within four days from the date of the ruling.