[2024] KECPT 927 (KLR)

[2024] KECPT 927 (KLR)

The Tribunal found that the Respondent had not demonstrated good faith or sufficient cause to warrant the stay, suspension, or lifting of the warrants of arrest and committal to civil jail. The Respondent had repeatedly delayed execution through multiple applications and had failed to negotiate in good faith,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KECPT 927 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: George Kinani Mungai; Respondent: Urithi Housing Co-operative Society Limited
Court
Cooperative Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Tribunal Case 168 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion Application / Ruling on Application to Stay Execution and for Payment by Instalments
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs to the Claimant.
Judges
J. Mwatsama, B Sawe, F Lotuiya, P. Gichuki, M Chesikaw, PO Aol
Legal Topics
Execution of Judgment, Payment by Installments, Warrants of Arrest, Garnishee Orders, Good Faith in Settlement
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Execution of Judgment Payment by Installments Warrants of Arrest Garnishee Orders Good Faith in Settlement

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

George Kinani Mungai

Applicant

Urithi Housing Co-operative Society Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Notice of Motion Application / Ruling on Application to Stay Execution and for Payment by Instalments

  1. 1 Whether the Respondent's application to stay, suspend or lift execution of warrants of arrest and committal to civil jail has merit.
  2. 2 Whether the Respondent should be allowed to liquidate the decretal sum by monthly instalments of Kshs. 50,000.
  3. 3 Who should bear the costs of the application.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the Respondent had not demonstrated good faith or sufficient cause to warrant the stay, suspension, or lifting of the warrants of arrest and committal to civil jail. The Respondent had repeatedly delayed execution through multiple applications and had failed to negotiate in good faith, including offering parcels of land already sold to third parties and refusing to engage meaningfully on the terms of payment by instalments. The Tribunal held that the Respondent had had ample time and opportunity to settle the decretal sum and that no sufficient reasons had been advanced to justify the orders sought. Accordingly, the application was dismissed and the Respondent was...

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs to the Claimant.

Orders

  • The Respondent's Notice of Motion Application dated 16th May, 2023 is dismissed.
  • The judgment debtor to bear the costs of this application.