[2022] KECA 768 (KLR)

[2022] KECA 768 (KLR)

The court found that the present application, which sought to stay the hearing of Civil Application No. 76 of 2018 and to allow the filing of a further affidavit in that matter, was rendered moot by the fact that Civil Application No. 76 of 2018 had already been disposed of by the court in a ruling of even date. The...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KECA 768 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Charles Michael Walker Munro; Respondent: Pamela Ann Walker Munro
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Malindi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Application 112 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Stay and Ancillary Orders
Outcome
application dismissed as overtaken by events
Judges
SG Kairu, P Nyamweya, JW Lessit
Legal Topics
Stay of Proceedings, Interlocutory Applications
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Stay of Proceedings Interlocutory Applications

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Charles Michael Walker Munro

Applicant

Pamela Ann Walker Munro

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Stay Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Stay and Ancillary Orders

  1. 1 Whether the hearing of Civil Application No. 76 of 2018 should be stayed pending the determination of the present application.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to file a further affidavit in Civil Application No. 76 of 2018.
  3. 3 Whether the present application is properly before the court given its filing under a different case number.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the present application, which sought to stay the hearing of Civil Application No. 76 of 2018 and to allow the filing of a further affidavit in that matter, was rendered moot by the fact that Civil Application No. 76 of 2018 had already been disposed of by the court in a ruling of even date. The court further noted that the present application was improperly filed under a different case number, though this procedural irregularity was ultimately immaterial given the substantive application had already been determined. Consequently, the court dismissed the application as overtaken by events, with no orders as to costs.

Court Disposition

application dismissed as overtaken by events

Orders

  • The application dated 30th November 2018 is dismissed.
  • There shall be no orders as to costs.