[2024] KEELC 7004 (KLR)
The court found that the 5th defendant failed to comply with clear court directions regarding the timely filing and service of submissions. Despite being granted multiple extensions and being put on notice of the consequences, the applicant did not serve the submissions as required. The court emphasized that...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEELC 7004 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Muranga Road Motor Mart Limited; Defendant: Jane Wairimu Kingori; Defendant: Tabitha Waruguru Maina; Defendant: Nancy Waturi Njonjo; Defendant: Director Of Survey Ministry Of Lands; Defendant: Nairobi City County Government; Defendant: Ocpd Buruburu Police Station
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case E038 of 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Preliminary Objection and Application for Res Judicata
- Outcome
- application and preliminary objection dismissed with costs to the plaintiff
- Judges
- LN Mbugua
- Legal Topics
- Res Judicata, Preliminary Objection, Non Compliance With Court Orders, Costs Award
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Muranga Road Motor Mart Limited
Plaintiff
Jane Wairimu Kingori
Defendant
Tabitha Waruguru Maina
Defendant
Nancy Waturi Njonjo
Defendant
Director Of Survey Ministry Of Lands
Defendant
Nairobi City County Government
Defendant
Ocpd Buruburu Police Station
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Preliminary Objection and Application for Res Judicata
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the application and preliminary objection are res judicata in light of ELC 1382 of 2016.
- 2 Whether the 5th defendant complied with court directions regarding filing and service of submissions.
- 3 Whether non-compliance with court orders warrants dismissal of the application and preliminary objection.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the 5th defendant failed to comply with clear court directions regarding the timely filing and service of submissions. Despite being granted multiple extensions and being put on notice of the consequences, the applicant did not serve the submissions as required. The court emphasized that non-compliance with its orders attracts sanctions, including dismissal. Furthermore, the application was not properly before the court as it was not paid for. Consequently, both the application and the preliminary objection dated 27th February 2024 were dismissed with costs to the plaintiff.
Court Disposition
application and preliminary objection dismissed with costs to the plaintiff
Orders
- The application dated 27th February 2024 is dismissed with costs to the plaintiff.
- The preliminary objection dated 27th February 2024 is dismissed with costs to the plaintiff.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
29 paragraphs
Muranga Road Motor Mart Limited v Kingori & 5 others (Environment & Land Case E038 of 2022) [2024] KEELC 7004 (KLR) (17 October 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEELC 7004 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
Environment & Land Case E038 of 2022
LN Mbugua, J
October 17, 2024
Between
Muranga Road Motor Mart Limited
Plaintiff
and
Jane Wairimu Kingori
1st Defendant
Tabitha Waruguru Maina
2nd Defendant
Nancy Waturi Njonjo
3rd Defendant
Director Of Survey Ministry Of Lands
4th Defendant
Nairobi City County Government
5th Defendant
Ocpd Buruburu Police Station
6th Defendant
Ruling
1. Before me is the 5th defendant’s Application dated 27th February 2024 seeking orders that this matter be found to be res-judicata to a sister case No. ELC 1382 of 2016 before Judge Oguttu. The applicant also filed a Preliminary Objection of even date seeking similar orders. On 9th of April 2024, the court gave directions for the prosecution of the aforementioned Preliminary Objection and application whereby the applicant was to file and serve submissions by 7. 5.2024, and the respondents there of were to file their submissions by 21. 5.2024. The court gave a rider that documents filed outside the given timelines were to stand as expunged.
2. On 27. 5.2024 it turned out that the applicants had not complied with the courts directions, hence they were given 14 days to comply and the matter was given a mention date of 23. 7.2024. On the said date of 23. 7.2024, the applicants averred that they were yet to file submissions. This time round, the court gave self executing orders as follows;“The records indicate that on 27. 5.2024, the applicants were granted 14 days to file submissions. They didn’t comply. The court will indulge them with 7 more days to file and serve written submissions by 30. 7.2024 failure to which, the application/Preliminary Objection shall stand as dismissed. The respondent (Plaintiff) is granted upto 7. 8.2024 to file/serve submissions. Ruling on 17. 10. 2024”.
3. It is noted that the submissions were filed on 30. 7.2024 at 16. 37 pm. There is no evidence of service as at 30. 7.2024 and it is no wonder that the respondents have not filed any submissions as per the courts directions.
4. None compliance with court orders attracts sanctions, See Otundo (Suing on his behalf and in his capacity as the personal representatives of the Estate of the Late Agnes Ogola - Deceased) v Otundo & 2 others (Environment & Land Case 20 of 2021) [2024] KEELC 4376 (KLR) (30 May 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KEELC 4376 (KLR). And in the case at hand, the applicant was put on notice, that their claim as set out in the Preliminary Objection and the application dated 27. 2.2024 faced imminent dismissal in the event of none compliance. I must add that the application itself is not even properly before the court as it was not paid for.In the end, both the application and the Preliminary Objection dated 27. 2.2024 stand as dismissed with costs to the plaintiff.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBI THIS 17thDAY OF OCTOBER 2024 THROUGH MICROSOFT TEAMS.LUCY N. MBUGUAJUDGEIn the presence of:Gitahi Njuguna for Plaintiff Respondents (holding brief for Murage)Irene Odhiambo holding brief for Mr. Bake for 5th DefendantM/s Awandu holding brief for Were for 1st – 3rd DefendantCourt Assistant: Joan/Vena