[2024] KEELRC 1429 (KLR)

[2024] KEELRC 1429 (KLR)

The court found that the claimant's proposed amendments sought to introduce new claims relating to events in 2016 and 2017, which predated the filing of the suit and were therefore outside the three-year limitation period prescribed by section 90 of the Employment Act. Allowing such amendments would contravene the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEELRC 1429 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Abbas Ali Murbe; Respondent: Libya Oil Kenya Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 288 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Ruling on Application to Amend Claim
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
Nzioki wa Makau
Legal Topics
Amendment of Pleadings, Limitation Periods, Employment Contracts
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Amendment of Pleadings Limitation Periods Employment Contracts

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Abbas Ali Murbe

Applicant

Libya Oil Kenya Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Interlocutory Application / Ruling on Application to Amend Claim

  1. 1 Whether the claimant should be granted leave to amend his claim to introduce new issues related to secondment to Chad.
  2. 2 Whether the proposed amendments are time-barred under section 90 of the Employment Act.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the claimant's proposed amendments sought to introduce new claims relating to events in 2016 and 2017, which predated the filing of the suit and were therefore outside the three-year limitation period prescribed by section 90 of the Employment Act. Allowing such amendments would contravene the statutory bar and undermine the purpose of limitation periods. The court held that no sufficient reason was provided for the delay, and the application was dismissed as it amounted to an abuse of the court process.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The claimant's application to amend the claim is dismissed.
  • No order as to costs.