[2019] KEHC 3834 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant was not aware of the court's ruling on the matter despite notices being issued, and that the absence of information regarding the delivery of the ruling vitiated the applicant's right to lodge an appeal on time. The court exercised its discretion under Section 7 of the Appellate...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEHC 3834 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Muri Mwaniki & Wamiti Advocates; Respondent: Edward Mukundi Karanja; Respondent: Veronica Wanjiku Karanja; Respondent: Emmanuel Mwangi Karanja
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Application 46 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- Application allowed in part; extension of time to lodge appeal granted.
- Judges
- MW Muigai
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Leave to Appeal, Notice of Appeal, Right of Appeal
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Muri Mwaniki & Wamiti Advocates
Applicant
Edward Mukundi Karanja
Respondent
Veronica Wanjiku Karanja
Respondent
Emmanuel Mwangi Karanja
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court should extend time for the applicant to file a notice of appeal against the order of 30th October 2017.
- 2 Whether leave to appeal should be granted to the applicant/advocate against the order of 30th October 2017.
- 3 Whether the applicant was prevented from appealing in time due to lack of notice of the judgment/order.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant was not aware of the court's ruling on the matter despite notices being issued, and that the absence of information regarding the delivery of the ruling vitiated the applicant's right to lodge an appeal on time. The court exercised its discretion under Section 7 of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act to extend the period for lodging the appeal, holding that the applicant should not be penalized for a delay caused by lack of notice. The court further recognized that the right of appeal must be expressly granted by statute, and that the applicant's request for leave to appeal and extension of time was properly before the court. Accordingly, the court extended...
Court Disposition
Application allowed in part; extension of time to lodge appeal granted.
Orders
- The period for lodging the appeal is extended to 30 days from the date of this ruling.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
46 paragraphs
REPUPLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
FAMILY DIVISION MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO.46 OF 2014
MURI MWANIKI & WAMITIADVOCATES...........APPLICANT/ADVOCATE
VERSUS
EDWARD MUKUNDI KARANJA...........................1ST RESPONDENT/CLIENT
VERONICA WANJIKU KARANJA........................2ND RESPONDENT/CLIENT
EMMANUEL MWANGI KARANJA.......................3RD RESPONDENT/CLIENT
RULING
The Applicant by Notice of Motion application dated 15th March 2018, sought for orders that:
(a) Time for making an application for leave to appeal by the Applicant/Advocate against the order of the Court made on the 30th October, 2017 be extended;
(b) Leave be granted to the Applicant/Advocate to appeal against the Order of the Court made on the 30th October 2017; and
(c) Time for giving the notice of appeal by the Applicant/Advocate against the Order of the Honourable Court made on the 30th October 2017.
The Application is founded on the following grounds:
(a) The Judgment/Order was set for delivery on notice but the Applicant/Advocate did not learn about the delivery of the said Judgment/Order until on or about 1st March 2018 upon receiving communication of its delivery through the Honourable Court’s letter of 21st February 2018;
(b) By the time of receiving the said notification, legal timelines for making application for leave to appeal and to lodge notice of appeal had long lapsed;
(c) The Advocate wishes to appeal against the said judgment and Order of 30th October 2017 and it is only fair that the time within which to make the application for leave to appeal be extended, the said leave to appeal be granted and that the time within which to issue the notice of appeal be extended.
SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT/ADVOCATE
Issues for Determination
From the Application, the Applicant invited this court to address the following issues:
(i) Extension of time to file a Notice of Appeal from the Court’s judgment as provided under Section 7 of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act, (Prayer 3 of the Application).
(ii) Leave to appeal under Section 75 of the Civil Procedure Act (Prayers 1 and 2 of the Application).
(iii) Costs, (Prayer 4 of the Application).
I. Extension of time to file a Notice of Appeal from the Court’s judgment as provided under Section 7 of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act, (Prayer 3 of the Application). Section 7 of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act provides as follows:
“7. Power of High Court to extend time
The High Court may extend the time for giving notice of intention to appeal from a judgment of the High Court or for making an application for leave to appeal or for a certificate that the case is fit for appeal, notwithstanding that the time for giving such notice or making such appeal may have already expired:
Provided that in the case of a sentence of death no extension of time shall be granted after the issue of the warrant for the execution of that sentence.”
This Section was applied in the Court of Appeal in the case of Kenya Airports Authority & Another v Timothy Nduvi Mutungi [2014] eKLR; where an application for extension of time to lodge Notice of Appeal was filed in the High Court and the High Court declined to hear it, instead asking the Applicant to file the application in the Court of Appeal Githinji JA, stated as follows:
“The application of 10th December, 2012 was properly made in the High Court as High Court has power to extend time for giving notice of intention to appeal pursuant to Rule 7 of the Court of Appeal Rules (sic) (clearly meant Section 7 of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act) which provides:
“The High Court may extend the time for giving notice of intention to appeal from a judgment of the High Court or for making an application for leave to appeal or for a certificate that the case is fit for appeal, notwithstanding that the time for giving such notice or making such appeal may have already expired.”
Since the application for extension of time for lodging a notice of appeal made in the High Court was competent and which the High Court should have determined...”
RESPONDENTS’ WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS
(a) The Applicant approached this court by way of a notice of motion dated and filed on 12th April 2018 seeking leave to appeal against the Judgment of this Court delivered on 30th October 2017 as well as extension of time to prefer the said appeal if leave is granted.
(b) In response thereto, on 14th May 2018, the Respondents filed Grounds of Opposition of even date. The Respondents also on 4th May 2018 filed their List of Authorities dated 2nd May 2018. The Respondents shall rely on these together with the present submissions.
(c) So as to avoid unnecessary duplicating documents already before the court, the Respondents shall rely on the cases produced in their List of Authorities aforesaid.
ON RIGHT TO APPEAL
In the case of Joel Nyabuto Omwenga & 2 Others v Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission & Another [2014] eKLR, the Court of Appeal allowed an application to strike out an appeal on the basis that no right of appeal lay against the impugned decision. The court held:
“Mr. Wikinson who appeared on behalf of the appellant advanced what we consider an ingenious argument that there is a right of appeal...because it is not expressly prohibited. We cannot accept this argument. It is well established that there is no right of appeal apart from statute, either it is expressly granted by statutory authority, or it is not. There is no right of appeal by mere implication or by inference.”
From the above circumstances advanced by the Applicant that the Applicant was not aware of the Court’s Ruling on the matter despite notices being issued. That absence and information of the delivery of the Ruling vitiated the Applicant’s right to lodge an appeal on time. I hereby extend the period for lodging the appeal within 30 days from delivery of the instant Ruling.
DELIVERED DATED & SIGNED IN OPEN COURT AT NAIROBI ON 4TH OCTOBER 2019.
M.W. MUIGAI
JUDGE
IN THE PRESENCE OF;
MR. LITORO H/B MR. ALLEN GICHUHI FOR THE RESPONDENT
N/A FOR APPLICANT
COURT ASSISTANT- MS JASMINE