[2019] KEHC 3834 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 3834 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant was not aware of the court's ruling on the matter despite notices being issued, and that the absence of information regarding the delivery of the ruling vitiated the applicant's right to lodge an appeal on time. The court exercised its discretion under Section 7 of the Appellate...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEHC 3834 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Muri Mwaniki & Wamiti Advocates; Respondent: Edward Mukundi Karanja; Respondent: Veronica Wanjiku Karanja; Respondent: Emmanuel Mwangi Karanja
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Application 46 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal
Outcome
Application allowed in part; extension of time to lodge appeal granted.
Judges
MW Muigai
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Leave to Appeal, Notice of Appeal, Right of Appeal
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Family and Children Extension of Time Leave to Appeal Notice of Appeal Right of Appeal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Muri Mwaniki & Wamiti Advocates

Applicant

Edward Mukundi Karanja

Respondent

Veronica Wanjiku Karanja

Respondent

Emmanuel Mwangi Karanja

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the High Court should extend time for the applicant to file a notice of appeal against the order of 30th October 2017.
  2. 2 Whether leave to appeal should be granted to the applicant/advocate against the order of 30th October 2017.
  3. 3 Whether the applicant was prevented from appealing in time due to lack of notice of the judgment/order.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant was not aware of the court's ruling on the matter despite notices being issued, and that the absence of information regarding the delivery of the ruling vitiated the applicant's right to lodge an appeal on time. The court exercised its discretion under Section 7 of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act to extend the period for lodging the appeal, holding that the applicant should not be penalized for a delay caused by lack of notice. The court further recognized that the right of appeal must be expressly granted by statute, and that the applicant's request for leave to appeal and extension of time was properly before the court. Accordingly, the court extended...

Court Disposition

Application allowed in part; extension of time to lodge appeal granted.

Orders

  • The period for lodging the appeal is extended to 30 days from the date of this ruling.