[2023] KEHC 17487 (KLR)

[2023] KEHC 17487 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant was instructed by the respondent, the bill of costs was taxed, and a certificate of costs was issued. The respondent did not file any objection or reference against the taxed bill, nor did they dispute the retainer. Under Section 51(1) and (2) of the Advocates Act, the certificate...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEHC 17487 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Muri Mwaniki & Mwiti Advocates; Respondent: Gateway Insurance Co Ltd
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Murang'a
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Application 69 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Judgment on Taxed Costs
Outcome
application allowed; judgment entered for applicant for taxed costs plus interest and costs of the application.
Judges
J Wakiaga
Legal Topics
Taxation of Costs, Advocate Client Bill, Certificate of Cost, Judgment Entry
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Taxation of Costs Advocate Client Bill Certificate of Cost Judgment Entry

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Muri Mwaniki & Mwiti Advocates

Applicant

Gateway Insurance Co Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Judgment on Taxed Costs

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to judgment for the sum certified in the certificate of costs.
  2. 2 Whether there is any valid objection or reference against the taxed bill of costs.
  3. 3 Whether the retainer of the applicant by the respondent is disputed.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant was instructed by the respondent, the bill of costs was taxed, and a certificate of costs was issued. The respondent did not file any objection or reference against the taxed bill, nor did they dispute the retainer. Under Section 51(1) and (2) of the Advocates Act, the certificate of costs is final as to the quantum payable, and the applicant is entitled to judgment for the certified sum with interest. The application was therefore merited and allowed.

Court Disposition

application allowed; judgment entered for applicant for taxed costs plus interest and costs of the application.

Orders

  • Judgment is entered for the applicant for Kshs. 260,838 as taxed by the Taxing Master.
  • Interest to accrue from the date of filing of the bill of costs until payment in full.