[2016] KEHC 7265 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant's bill of costs had been taxed and certified at Kshs 164,187.00, of which Kshs 100,000.00 had been paid, leaving a balance of Kshs 64,187.00. The respondent did not contest the application or the applicant's assertion regarding the outstanding balance. Under section 51(2) of the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2016] KEHC 7265 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Muri Mwaniki & Wamiti Advocates; Respondent: Africa Merchant Assurance Company Ltd
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nyeri
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Children Miscellaneous Application 121 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Judgment on Certified Costs
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Legal Topics
- Taxation of Costs, Advocate Client Bills, Entry of Judgment, Certificate of Taxation
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Muri Mwaniki & Wamiti Advocates
Applicant
Africa Merchant Assurance Company Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Judgment on Certified Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to judgment for the certified costs under section 51(2) of the Advocates Act.
- 2 Whether the respondent has settled the entire amount taxed and certified by the Deputy Registrar.
- 3 Whether the court should enter judgment for the outstanding balance as prayed by the applicant.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant's bill of costs had been taxed and certified at Kshs 164,187.00, of which Kshs 100,000.00 had been paid, leaving a balance of Kshs 64,187.00. The respondent did not contest the application or the applicant's assertion regarding the outstanding balance. Under section 51(2) of the Advocates Act, the certificate of taxation is final as to the amount due unless set aside or altered by the court. Since there was no dispute as to the retainer or the amount due, and the respondent did not challenge the application, the applicant was entitled to judgment for the certified sum. The court therefore allowed the application and entered judgment for the outstanding...
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- Judgment is entered for the applicant against the respondent for Kshs 64,187.00.
- The respondent shall pay interest at 14% per annum from the date of filing the bill of costs until payment in full.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
21 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NYERI
MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 121 OF 2014
MURI MWANIKI & WAMITI ADVOCATES….APP/ADVOCATES
VERSUS
AFRICA MERCHANT ASSURANCE
COMPANY LTD…………………………..RESPONDENT/CLIENT
RULING
The applicant, which is a firm of advocates, moved this Honourable Court through a Notice of Motion dated 29th September, 2015 in which it sought orders for judgment to be entered, apparently against the respondent, for the sum of Kshs 64,187. 00 in costs certified by the Deputy Registrar on 24th September, 2014. The applicant also sought for interest on the sum of Kshs 64, 187. 00 at the rate of 14 % per annum from the date of filing its bill of costs until payment in full and also asked for the costs of the application.
The application was supported by the affidavit of Martin G Mwaniki who trades in the name and style of the applicant as an advocate of the High Court of Kenya. In that affidavit, counsel deposed that he acted for the respondent in Nyeri Chief Magistrates Court Civil Case No. 298 of 2009, Catherine Mumbi Waithaka versus Peter Maina King’ori.His bill of costs for representing the respondent was taxed at Kshs 164, 187. 00 out of which the respondent settled Kshs 100,000. 00 leaving a balance of Kshs 64,187. 00.
Counsel deposed that he would wish to commence execution proceedings against the respondent once the taxed costs have been endorsed as judgment of this Honourable Court.
Though the respondent was served with the application and the hearing notice, it neither filed any response to the application nor appeared when the application came up for hearing on 25th January, 2016; in its absence, the application proceeded ex parte.
Section 51 of the Advocates which counsel has invoked in search for the orders expressed in the application provides as follows:-
51. General provisions as to taxation
(1) Every application for an order for the taxation of an advocate’s bill or for the delivery of such a bill and the delivering up of any deeds, documents and papers by an advocate shall be made in the matter of that advocate.
(2) The certificate of the taxing officer by whom any bill has been taxed shall, unless it is set aside or altered by the Court, be final as to the amount of the costs covered thereby, and the Court may make such order in relation thereto as it thinks fit, including, in a case where the retainer is not disputed, an order that judgment be entered for the sum certified to be due with costs.
Of particular relevance to this application is subsection (2) of this section. The certificate of the taxing officer referred to in that subsection has been exhibited to the applicant’s affidavit showing that indeed the advocate’s bill was taxed at Kshs 164,187. 00.
The applicant’s contention that only Kshs 100,000/= has been paid and that the sum of Kshs 64, 187. 00 is still outstanding has not been controverted. The applicant in my humble view has made out a case for an order for judgment to be entered for the sum certified to be due with costs. I will therefore allow the application as prayed. Orders accordingly.
Signed, dated and delivered in open court this 11th March, 2016
Ngaah Jairus
JUDGE