[2023] KEELC 22512 (KLR)

[2023] KEELC 22512 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiffs had provided a clear explanation for the delay in filing the letter dated 18th May 2023. There was no objection from the defendants, who did not file any response or submissions. The court, guided by Article 159(2)(b) and (d) of the Constitution, held that justice should not be...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEELC 22512 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Mr. John Muriithi & 17 others Registered as Oleshua Community Organisation; Defendant: Hon. George Nyanja; Defendant: Mwitu Estate Water Company Ltd; Defendant: Nairobi County Government
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 774 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Leave to File Additional Document Out of Time
Outcome
Application allowed.
Judges
EK Wabwoto
Legal Topics
Leave to File Document Out of Time, Procedural Fairness, Admission of Evidence
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Leave to File Document Out of Time Procedural Fairness Admission of Evidence

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr. John Muriithi & 17 others Registered as Oleshua Community Organisation

Plaintiff

Hon. George Nyanja

Defendant

Mwitu Estate Water Company Ltd

Defendant

Nairobi County Government

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Leave to File Additional Document Out of Time

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiffs should be granted leave to file the letter dated 18th May 2023 out of time.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiffs had provided a clear explanation for the delay in filing the letter dated 18th May 2023. There was no objection from the defendants, who did not file any response or submissions. The court, guided by Article 159(2)(b) and (d) of the Constitution, held that justice should not be defeated by procedural technicalities and that the admission of the document would not prejudice the defendants. Accordingly, the court exercised its discretion to allow the application and granted leave for the letter to be filed and served within seven days.

Court Disposition

Application allowed.

Orders

  • The document referred to as the letter dated 18th May 2023 to be filed and served upon the defendants within 7 days from the date of the ruling.
  • Each party to bear own costs of the application.