[2024] KECPT 1733 (KLR)

[2024] KECPT 1733 (KLR)

The Tribunal found that the respondent did not dispute the debt or the amount owed to the claimants, and her application was based solely on her medical and financial hardship. The Tribunal held that while it sympathized with her circumstances, such hardship was not a sufficient ground to stay execution of a...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KECPT 1733 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Jane Waruguru Muriithi; Applicant: Mercy Nyambura; Respondent: Agnes Wangari Macharia
Court
Cooperative Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Tribunal Case 853/E947 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution and Installment Payment
Outcome
application dismissed with costs; structured installment payment ordered
Judges
BM Kimemia, Janet Mwatsama, B Sawe, F Lotuiya, P. Gichuki, M Chesikaw, PO Aol
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Installment Liquidation of Debt, Ex Parte Judgment, Service of Process, Decretal Sum Enforcement
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Commercial and Corporate Stay of Execution Installment Liquidation of Debt Ex Parte Judgment Service of Process Decretal Sum Enforcement

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jane Waruguru Muriithi

Applicant

Mercy Nyambura

Applicant

Agnes Wangari Macharia

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Notice of Motion Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution and Installment Payment

  1. 1 Whether the ex parte judgment should be stayed due to alleged lack of service and respondent's medical and financial hardship.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent should be allowed to liquidate the decretal sum in monthly installments of Kshs 3,000.
  3. 3 Whether the proposed mode of repayment is just and reasonable given the amount owed.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the respondent did not dispute the debt or the amount owed to the claimants, and her application was based solely on her medical and financial hardship. The Tribunal held that while it sympathized with her circumstances, such hardship was not a sufficient ground to stay execution of a judgment where the debt is uncontested. The Tribunal further determined that the proposed installment payment of Kshs 3,000 per month was unreasonable, as it would take over 18 years to settle the decretal sum, which is contrary to the interests of justice and public policy. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the application for stay and for payment by small installments, but...

Court Disposition

application dismissed with costs; structured installment payment ordered

Orders

  • The Notice of Motion Application dated 27th June, 2024 is dismissed with costs.
  • The respondent shall pay Kshs 30,000 on or before 10th December 2024.