[2025] KEHC 2963 (KLR)
The High Court found that a prima facie case for revision had been established on the basis that the trial court's acceptance of a guilty plea must be scrutinized for regularity, especially where the record may reveal sufficient cause not to accept the plea. The Court held that it is necessary to call for and...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] KEHC 2963 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Justo Nyaga Muriithi; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kerugoya
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application E057 of 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Revision and Stay
- Outcome
- Application for calling and examining trial court record granted; stay of trial ordered pending determination of application.
- Judges
- EM Muriithi
- Legal Topics
- Revision of Criminal Proceedings, Plea of Guilty, Supervisory Jurisdiction, Trial Irregularities
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Justo Nyaga Muriithi
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Revision and Stay
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court should call for and examine the Magistrate's Court record in Kerugoya MCTR/217/2019 to determine the regularity of the proceedings.
- 2 Whether an order of mistrial should be issued in respect of the charges and proceedings against the applicant.
- 3 Whether the accused's trial should be stayed pending determination of the application for revision.
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court found that a prima facie case for revision had been established on the basis that the trial court's acceptance of a guilty plea must be scrutinized for regularity, especially where the record may reveal sufficient cause not to accept the plea. The Court held that it is necessary to call for and examine the trial court file to determine the legality of the proceedings before making a substantive ruling on the application for review. Pending this examination, the Court exercised its supervisory jurisdiction and revisionary powers to stay the accused's trial until the application is determined.
Court Disposition
Application for calling and examining trial court record granted; stay of trial ordered pending determination of application.
Orders
- The High Court shall call for and examine the trial court file in Kerugoya MCTR/217 of 2019 Republic v. Justo Nyaga Muriithi.
- The accused's trial is stayed pending determination of this application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
19 paragraphs
Muriithi v Republic (Miscellaneous Criminal Application E057 of 2024) [2025] KEHC 2963 (KLR) (13 March 2025) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 2963 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Kerugoya
Miscellaneous Criminal Application E057 of 2024
EM Muriithi, J
March 13, 2025
Between
Justo Nyaga Muriithi
Applicant
and
Republic
Respondent
Ruling
1. The applicant filed a notice of motion dated 10th December, 2024 seeking the following orders:1. Spent.2. Spent.3. That pending the hearing and determination of this Application/Suit, this Honourable Court be pleased to call for and examine the Magistrates’ Court record and proceedings in Kerugoya MCTR/217/2019-Republic v Justo Nyaga Muriithi to satisfy itself as to the regularity of the proceedings therein.4. That this Honourable Court be pleased to issue an order of mistrial in respect of the charges and proceedings in Kerugoya MCTR/217/2019-Republic v Justo Nyaga Muriithi.5. That this Honourable Court provides for the costs of this Application.
2. On the evidence and submissions presented before the Court, the Court finds a prima facie case for revision on the ground of the improper trial of an accused who pleads guilty to a charge and, although, “the Court is not bound to accept the accused’s admission of the truth of the charge and convict him as there may in the words of the statute [s.207(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code] “appear sufficient cause to the contrary” (See Ndede v. R (1991) KLR 567), the reasons may only be deciphered from the record of the trial proceedings. In the circumstances, it is important to call for the trial court file for examination on the basis of the submissions by the Counsel for the Parties before ruling on the application for review.
Order 3. Accordingly, for the reasons set out above, the Court grants the request for the Court to call and examine the trial court file in Kerugoya MCTR/217 of 2019 Republic v. Justo Nyaga Muriithi. The Court shall in exercise of its supervisory jurisdiction under Article 165 (6) and (7) of the Constitution and revision powers under section 362 of the criminal procedure Code review the legality of trial court’s proceedings and rule on it on 27/3/2025.
4. The accused’s trial shall be stayed pending determination of this application.Order accordingly.
DATED AND DELIVERED ON THIS 13TH DAY OF MARCH 2025. EDWARD M. MURIITHIJUDGEAppearances:Mr. Eric Ngunjiri for Applicant.Mr. Mamba for the DPP..