[2022] KEHC 16526 (KLR)
The court declined to grant bond pending appeal because the trial court file was not available, making it impossible to determine whether the appellant met the legal threshold for release. Without the trial court proceedings, the court could not assess the merits of the application or the existence of exceptional...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] KEHC 16526 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Lydia Murunga; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kiambu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal E033 of 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Ruling on Bond Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Judges
- RB Ngetich
- Legal Topics
- Bond Pending Appeal, Bail Principles, Sexual Offences, Appeal Procedure
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lydia Murunga
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Ruling on Bond Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant is entitled to bond pending appeal under section 357 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
- 2 Whether exceptional or unusual circumstances exist to justify release on bond pending appeal.
- 3 Whether the absence of the trial court file precludes determination of the application.
Ratio Decidendi
The court declined to grant bond pending appeal because the trial court file was not available, making it impossible to determine whether the appellant met the legal threshold for release. Without the trial court proceedings, the court could not assess the merits of the application or the existence of exceptional circumstances as required by law. The application was therefore dismissed, but the appellant was granted liberty to renew the application once the necessary records are availed.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The application for bond pending appeal is hereby dismissed.
- The applicant may renew bond application at a later date.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
25 paragraphs
Murunga v Republic (Criminal Appeal E033 of 2022) [2022] KEHC 16526 (KLR) (15 December 2022) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2022] KEHC 16526 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Kiambu
Criminal Appeal E033 of 2022
RB Ngetich, J
December 15, 2022
Between
Lydia Murunga
Appellant
and
Republic
Respondent
Ruling
1. By the application dated June 4, 2022, the appellant seeks release on bond pending appeal under the provisions of section 357 of the Criminal Procedure Code (2012). The application is premised on the grounds that the appellant is not a flight risk; she was admitted to bond in the Chief magistrate’s court and attended all court without fail, the appellant is unwell and needs to seek proper medical attention and supervision, the appeal has a high chance of success and that the appellant is a law-abiding citizen.
2. The application is supported by the annexed affidavit sworn by the appellant Lydia Murunga on June 4, 2022. She reiterates the grounds of the application.
3. Counsel for the state Mr Kasyoka was not opposed to the application.
4. The accused was charged with the offence of sexual assault contrary to section 5 (1) (a) (1) (2) of the Sexual Offences Act No 3 of 2006.
5. An application for bond pending appeal is not a constitutional right as compared to bail pending trial. Section 357 of theCriminal Procedure Code provide as follows:'(1)After the entering of an appeal by a person entitled to appeal, the high court, or the subordinate court which convicted or sentenced that person, may order that he be released on bail with or without sureties, or, if that person is not released on bail, shall at his request order that the execution of the sentence or order appealed against shall be suspended pending the hearing of his appeal:
6. The case ofJivraj Shah v Republic [1986] eKLR sets out the principles for granting bail/bond pending appeal as follows:-a.The existence of exceptional or unusual circumstances upon which a court of appeal can fairly conclude that it is in the interest of justice to grant bail.b.Whether the appeal has overwhelming chances of success.c.Whether there is a likelihood of the appellant having served a substantial part of the sentence by the time of appeal is heard and determined.
7. The court file has only a copy of the judgment and the application; the trial court file has not been availed; without the trial court proceedings/file it will be difficult for this court to establish whether the appellant has met the threshold required by law for granting bail pending appeal.
8. In this circumstance, I decline to allow application for bond pending appeal at this stage. Applicant is at liberty to renew application.
Final orders: - 1. The application for bond pending appeal is hereby dismissed.
2. The applicant may renew bond application at a later date.
RULING DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED VIRTUALLY AT KIAMBU THIS 15TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2022. .............................RACHEL NGETICHJUDGEIn the Presence of :Kinyua/Martin – Court AssistantsAppellant – PresentMr. Kasyoka for StateMrs. Ashioya for Appellant