[2025] KEHC 6494 (KLR)
The court found that the moratorium declared in respect of Blue Shield Insurance Company Limited, as extended by court orders, only applies to the payment of claims and not to the determination of liability or the delivery of judgment. The court emphasized that it retains jurisdiction to determine the issues before...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] KEHC 6494 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Lawrence Mutwiri Murunge; Defendant: Julius Mbale Murungi; Defendant: Zacharia Muriuki Gilbert; Defendant: Jessikay Enterprises
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nyeri
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 20 May 2025
- Case Number
- Civil Case 125 of 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Case / Ruling on Application to Suspend Delivery of Judgment Pending Winding Up Proceedings of Insurer
- Outcome
- application dismissed with costs to the plaintiff
- Judges
- M Muya
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Proceedings, Moratorium on Payments, Winding Up of Insurer, Liability of Insurer, Statutory Management
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lawrence Mutwiri Murunge
Plaintiff
Julius Mbale Murungi
Defendant
Zacharia Muriuki Gilbert
Defendant
Jessikay Enterprises
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Application to Suspend Delivery of Judgment Pending Winding Up Proceedings of Insurer
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should suspend the delivery of its judgment pending the determination of the winding up cause involving Blue Shield Insurance Company Limited.
- 2 Whether the moratorium declared in respect of Blue Shield Insurance Company Limited bars the court from delivering judgment in the present suit.
- 3 Whether the applicant is protected from liability for damages by virtue of the moratorium and pending winding up proceedings.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the moratorium declared in respect of Blue Shield Insurance Company Limited, as extended by court orders, only applies to the payment of claims and not to the determination of liability or the delivery of judgment. The court emphasized that it retains jurisdiction to determine the issues before it and that the existence of winding up proceedings and a moratorium does not preclude the court from proceeding to judgment. The applicant's delay in raising the issue and the prolonged pendency of the suit further militated against granting the application. Consequently, the application to suspend the delivery of judgment was found to lack merit and was dismissed with costs...
Court Disposition
application dismissed with costs to the plaintiff
Orders
- The application dated 28th November, 2023 is dismissed with costs to the plaintiff.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment