[2018] KECA 240 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant had prepared and handed over the notice of appeal to prison authorities in time, but it was not received by the Court of Appeal Registry. The respondent did not contest these facts. In the interest of justice and exercising judicial discretion, the court held that the applicant had...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KECA 240 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Musa Okoth Saka; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Court Station
- Court of Appeal at Kisumu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Appeal (Application) 10 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Judges
- AM Githinji
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Notice of Appeal, Appellate Procedure
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Musa Okoth Saka
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant should be granted an extension of time to file a notice of appeal against the High Court judgment.
- 2 Whether the applicant has provided sufficient explanation for the delay in filing the notice of appeal.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant had prepared and handed over the notice of appeal to prison authorities in time, but it was not received by the Court of Appeal Registry. The respondent did not contest these facts. In the interest of justice and exercising judicial discretion, the court held that the applicant had provided a satisfactory explanation for the delay. Consequently, the court allowed the application and extended the time for filing the notice of appeal.
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- Time for filing notice of appeal is extended.
- The notice of appeal to be filed within seven (7) days from the date of this ruling.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
23 paragraphs
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL
AT KISUMU
(CORAM: GITHINJI, JA. (IN CHAMBER)
CRIMINAL APPEAL (APPLICATION) NO. 10 OF 2018
BETWEEN
MUSA OKOTH SAKA...................................APPELLANT
AND
REPUBLIC.................................................RESPONDENT
(Being an Appeal from the Judgment of the High Court of Kenya
at Kisumu, (Onesmus, J.) dated 22nd day of January, 2013
in
H.C.CR. A. NO. 9 OF 2013)
*************************
RULING
This is an application for extension of time within which to file a notice of appeal against the judgment of the High Court in Criminal Appeal No. 9 of 2013 delivered on 22nd November, 2013. The application is supported by the affidavit of Richard Onsongo, the applicant’s counsel. Mr Sirtuy, learned prosecutions counsel has not filed a replying affidavit. He however indicated that he has no objection to the application.
The application is made on the basis that the applicant prepared a notice of appeal in time and handed it over to prison authorities to forward it to the Court of Appeal Registry and that an inquiry at the Registry by the applicant’s counsel revealed that the said notice of appeal was not received by the registry. As the respondent did not file a replying affidavit the facts supporting the application are not controverted.
In the circumstances and in the interest of justice, I would exercise my discretion in favour of the applicant and extend time as prayed. Accordingly, the application is allowed. Time for filing notice of appeal is extended. The notice of appeal to be filed within seven (7) days from the date hereof.
Made at Kisumu this 22nd day of October, 2018.
E. M. GITHINJI
...................................
JUDGE OF APPEAL
I certify that this is a true copyof the original
DEPUTY REGISTRAR