[2018] KEHC 2408 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant was charged and convicted under the Forest Act, 2005, which had been repealed by the Forest Conservation and Management Act, 2016. As a result, the charge was fatally defective, and the conviction could not stand. The court held that a person cannot be convicted for an offence that...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEHC 2408 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Musee Musembi; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kitui
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Revision 245 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Revision / Ruling on Application for Revision of Sentence
- Outcome
- conviction quashed and sentence set aside
- Judges
- LN Mutende
- Legal Topics
- Revision of Sentence, Plea of Guilty, Defective Charge, Repealed Statute
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Musee Musembi
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling on Application for Revision of Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant was convicted and sentenced under a law that had been repealed.
- 2 Whether the charge as framed was fatally defective and could sustain a conviction.
- 3 Whether the sentence imposed was lawful in the circumstances.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant was charged and convicted under the Forest Act, 2005, which had been repealed by the Forest Conservation and Management Act, 2016. As a result, the charge was fatally defective, and the conviction could not stand. The court held that a person cannot be convicted for an offence that is not known in law or under a repealed statute. Consequently, the conviction and sentence were quashed, and the applicant was ordered to be released unless otherwise lawfully held.
Court Disposition
conviction quashed and sentence set aside
Orders
- The conviction is quashed.
- The sentence is set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
24 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KITUI
CRIMINAL REVISION NO. 245 OF 2018
MUSEE MUSEMBI............................................APPLICANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC......................................................RESPONDENT
R U L I N G
1. Musee Musembi, the Applicant was arraigned before court having been charged with the offence of Transporting Forest produce without a permit Contrary to Section 52 (1) of the Forest Act. He pleaded guilty and was convicted on his own plea of guilty whereby he was sentenced to serve twelve (12) months imprisonment.
2. By a letter dated the 17th May 2018, Messrs J.K. Mwalimuand Company Advocates seek Revision of the sentence meted out which is stated to be harsh and excessive.
3. This is a case where the applicant admitted the charge at the outset. Section 348 of the Criminal Procedure Code provides thus;
“No appeal shall be allowed in the case of an accused person who has pleaded
guilty and has been convicted on that plea by a subordinate court, except as to the extent or legality of the sentence”
4. The plea as recorded is unequivocal. It is for that reason that I am only called upon to examine the sentence imposed.
5. Having reconsidered the charge as framed I must interrogate whether the charge as framed should have resulted into a conviction(See Laurent Mpinga Vs. R. (1983) TLR 166).
6. The Forest Conservation and Management Act, 2016 (Act)came into force in the year 2011. The date of assent was the 31stday of August, 2016, while the date of commencement was the 31st March, 2017.
Section 76 of the Act provides as follows;
“The Forest Act, 2005 and Timber Act are hereby repealed”.
7. The Forest Act, 2005, Chapter 385 of the Laws of Kenya commenced on 1st February, 2007, and it is the Act No. 7 of 2005, (L.N. 19/2007). This is the Act that was repealed by the Forest Conservation andManagement Act, 2016.
8. The consequence of the foregoing is that the Applicant/offender was charged with an offence not known in law, as the charge was fatally defective.
9. In the premises, I quash the conviction and set aside the sentence meted out and any other consequential orders.The Applicant /offender shall be set free forthwith unless otherwise lawfully held.
10. It is so ordered.
Dated, Signedand delivered in Kitui this 5th day of October, 2018.
L.N. MUTENDE
JUDGE