[2022] KEHC 528 (KLR)

[2022] KEHC 528 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant's bill of costs had been taxed and certified by the Deputy Registrar, and that the respondent had not opposed the application for entry of judgment. In the absence of any opposition or reason to decline the prayers sought, the court held that the applicant was entitled to judgment...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEHC 528 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Kitindio Musembi; Respondent: Africa Merchant Assurance Co. Ltd
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Makueni
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Application E047 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Unopposed Application for Entry of Judgment After Taxation of Costs
Outcome
Application allowed. Judgment entered for the applicant for the taxed sum. Liberty to execute granted. Costs awarded to the applicant.
Judges
GMA Dulu
Legal Topics
Taxation of Costs, Advocate Client Bill, Entry of Judgment, Execution of Decree
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Taxation of Costs Advocate Client Bill Entry of Judgment Execution of Decree

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kitindio Musembi

Applicant

Africa Merchant Assurance Co. Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Unopposed Application for Entry of Judgment After Taxation of Costs

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to judgment for the taxed costs under section 51(2) of the Advocates Act.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to execute against the respondent for the taxed amount.
  3. 3 Whether the respondent should bear the costs of the application.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant's bill of costs had been taxed and certified by the Deputy Registrar, and that the respondent had not opposed the application for entry of judgment. In the absence of any opposition or reason to decline the prayers sought, the court held that the applicant was entitled to judgment for the taxed amount pursuant to section 51(2) of the Advocates Act. The court further held that the applicant was entitled to execute against the respondent for the taxed sum and that the costs of the application would be borne by the respondent.

Court Disposition

Application allowed. Judgment entered for the applicant for the taxed sum. Liberty to execute granted. Costs awarded to the applicant.

Orders

  • Judgment is entered for the sum of Kshs.80,910/= as taxed and certified by the Deputy Registrar as due to the applicant.
  • The applicant is at liberty to execute against the respondent.