[2022] KEHC 588 (KLR)

[2022] KEHC 588 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant's bill of costs had been taxed and certified by the Deputy Registrar, and the respondent had neither paid the amount nor filed any opposition to the application. There being no dispute as to retainer or the amount due, and the application being unopposed, the court held that there...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEHC 588 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Kitindio Musembi; Respondent: Africa Merchant Assurance Co. Ltd
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Makueni
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Application E032 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Unopposed Application for Entry of Judgment After Taxation of Costs
Outcome
application allowed; judgment entered for applicant for taxed costs; liberty to execute; costs to applicant
Judges
GMA Dulu
Legal Topics
Taxation of Costs, Advocate Client Bill, Entry of Judgment, Execution of Decree
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Taxation of Costs Advocate Client Bill Entry of Judgment Execution of Decree

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kitindio Musembi

Applicant

Africa Merchant Assurance Co. Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Unopposed Application for Entry of Judgment After Taxation of Costs

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to entry of judgment for the taxed costs as certified by the Deputy Registrar.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to execute against the respondent for the taxed amount.
  3. 3 Whether the costs of the application should be borne by the respondent.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant's bill of costs had been taxed and certified by the Deputy Registrar, and the respondent had neither paid the amount nor filed any opposition to the application. There being no dispute as to retainer or the amount due, and the application being unopposed, the court held that there was no basis for declining the prayers sought. Accordingly, judgment was entered for the applicant for the taxed sum, with liberty to execute, and costs of the application awarded to the applicant.

Court Disposition

application allowed; judgment entered for applicant for taxed costs; liberty to execute; costs to applicant

Orders

  • Judgment is entered for the sum of Kshs 179,821.40 as taxed and certified by the Deputy Registrar as due to the applicant.
  • The applicant is at liberty to execute against the respondent.