[2025] KEELC 3633 (KLR)

[2025] KEELC 3633 (KLR)

The court found that the Defendant's Notice of Motion dated 14th November, 2024 was not sub-judice because it was filed before the Plaintiff's application dated 29th November, 2024 and sought different reliefs. The court also held that the application was not res judicata since the previous suit (Makueni ELC No. 200...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KEELC 3633 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Michael Musau Musyoki; Defendant: Josephne Kanini Musyoki
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Makueni
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case E010 of 2024
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Outcome
preliminary objection dismissed with costs to the defendant
Judges
EO Obaga
Legal Topics
Preliminary Objection, Res Judicata, Sub Judice, Joinder of Parties, Injunctive Relief
Source Language
english
Civil Procedure Land and Property Preliminary Objection Res Judicata Sub Judice Joinder of Parties Injunctive Relief

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Michael Musau Musyoki

Plaintiff

Josephne Kanini Musyoki

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Preliminary Objection

  1. 1 Whether the Defendant's Notice of Motion dated 14th November, 2024 is sub-judice.
  2. 2 Whether the Defendant's Notice of Motion dated 14th November, 2024 is res judicata.
  3. 3 Whether the preliminary objection raises a pure point of law.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Defendant's Notice of Motion dated 14th November, 2024 was not sub-judice because it was filed before the Plaintiff's application dated 29th November, 2024 and sought different reliefs. The court also held that the application was not res judicata since the previous suit (Makueni ELC No. 200 of 2017) was dismissed for want of prosecution and not determined on merit. Furthermore, the court determined that the preliminary objection did not raise a pure point of law as required by the principles set out in Mukisa Biscuit Manufacturing Ltd v West End Distributors Ltd. Consequently, the preliminary objection lacked merit and was dismissed with costs to the Defendant.

Court Disposition

preliminary objection dismissed with costs to the defendant

Orders

  • The preliminary objection is dismissed with costs to the Defendant.