[2022] KEHC 16041 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant's explanation for delay—being in quarantine twice due to the COVID-19 pandemic—constituted good cause within the meaning of section 349 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The court took judicial notice of the adverse effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on court operations and access,...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] KEHC 16041 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Joseph Kiprono Mutai; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kilgoris
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application E006 of 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
- Outcome
- Application allowed. Leave to appeal out of time granted.
- Judges
- F Gikonyo
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Good Cause for Delay, Criminal Appeals, Covid 19 Impact on Procedure
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Joseph Kiprono Mutai
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has shown good cause for the court to allow him to file an appeal out of time.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant's explanation for delay—being in quarantine twice due to the COVID-19 pandemic—constituted good cause within the meaning of section 349 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The court took judicial notice of the adverse effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on court operations and access, noting that the relevant period coincided with restrictions and protocols that impeded timely filing. The court rejected the prosecution's argument that the delay was unjustified and exercised its discretion to allow the applicant to file the appeal out of time, granting a 14-day window for filing.
Court Disposition
Application allowed. Leave to appeal out of time granted.
Orders
- The applicant is granted leave to file the appeal within 14 days from the date of this ruling.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
24 paragraphs
Mutai v Republic (Miscellaneous Criminal Application E006 of 2022) [2022] KEHC 16041 (KLR) (6 December 2022) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2022] KEHC 16041 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Kilgoris
Miscellaneous Criminal Application E006 of 2022
F Gikonyo, J
December 6, 2022
Between
Joseph Kiprono Mutai
Applicant
and
Republic
Respondent
Ruling
Leave to appeal out of time 1. Vide an undated notice of motion filed herein, the applicant is seeking leave to appeal out of time.
2. The applicant was convicted on February 8, 2021 and sentenced to serve 15 years’ imprisonment.
3. The major ground in support of his application is that he could not file his appeal in time because he was in quarantine twice for COVID-19.
4. The prosecution opposed the application arguing that over 1 ½ years have lapsed and no good reason has been adduced for the delay.
Analysis and Determination 5. In the nature of the application, I should determine;
a. Whether the applicant has shown good cause for the court to allow him to file appeal out of time. 6. According to section 349 Criminal Procedure Code: -'An appeal shall be entered within fourteen days of the date of the order or sentence appealed against:Provided that the court to which the appeal is made may for good cause admit an appeal after the period of fourteen days has elapsed, and shall so admit an appeal if it is satisfied that the failure to enter the appeal within that period has been caused by the inability of the appellant or his advocate to obtain a copy of the judgment or order appealed against, and a copy of the record, within a reasonable time of applying to the court, therefore.'
7. The section provides for discretion to admit an appeal out of time if good cause has been shown by the applicant. Good cause includes; failure to enter the appeal within that period has been caused by the inability of the appellant or his advocate to obtain a copy of the judgment or order appealed against, and a copy of the record, within a reasonable time of applying to the court. I have deliberately used the words 'good cause includes', for section 349 of the CPC is not and cannot be exhaustive. I should however, also state that 'good cause' in section 349 of the CPC does not extend to the merits or otherwise of the intended appeal. On this latter proposition, I am content to cite the case Republic –v- Ranchandra Shankaria Bhatt (2017) eKLR:
Applying the test 8. The applicant claims that he was not able to file his appeal in time because he was in quarantine twice due to COVID-19 pandemic. This court takes judicial notice that the COVID-19 pandemic adversely affected the operations of, as well as access to the court and other institutions. The relevant period falls within the time when COVID-19 restrictions and protocol were applicable. Accordingly, and contrary to the submission by the prosecution, there is good cause shown why the applicant did not file appeal in time. I allow him to file appeal within 14 days.
9. It is hereby so ordered.
DATED, SIGNED, AND DELIVERED AT KILGORIS THROUGH THE MICROSOFT TEAMS ONLINE APPLICATION, THIS 6TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2022. ...............................F. GIKONYO M.JUDGEIn the presence of:1. Mr. Okeyo for the Respondent2. Mr. Kasaso CA3. Applicant - absent