[2025] KECPT 202 (KLR)

[2025] KECPT 202 (KLR)

The Tribunal found that the claimant had established membership in the respondent sacco and proved deposits of Kshs. 141,800 as at June 2024. The respondent did not dispute the existence or quantum of the deposits but relied on an AGM resolution suspending refunds due to financial constraints. The Tribunal held that...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KECPT 202 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Alfred Nyongesa Mutaro; Respondent: Metropolitan National Sacco Limited
Court
Cooperative Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Tribunal Case E523 of 2024
Procedural Posture
Refund Claim / Judgment
Outcome
judgment for the claimant
Judges
BM Kimemia, Janet Mwatsama, B Sawe, F Lotuiya, P. Gichuki, M Chesikaw, PO Aol
Legal Topics
Sacco Member Refunds, Deposit Recovery, Share Capital Non Refundability
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Commercial and Corporate Sacco Member Refunds Deposit Recovery Share Capital Non Refundability

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Alfred Nyongesa Mutaro

Applicant

Metropolitan National Sacco Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Refund Claim / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the claimant is entitled to a refund of deposits and shares upon withdrawal from the respondent sacco.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent's financial constraints and AGM resolution to suspend refunds constitute a valid defence to non-payment.
  3. 3 Whether the claimant complied with statutory notice requirements under the Cooperative Societies Act.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the claimant had established membership in the respondent sacco and proved deposits of Kshs. 141,800 as at June 2024. The respondent did not dispute the existence or quantum of the deposits but relied on an AGM resolution suspending refunds due to financial constraints. The Tribunal held that such internal resolutions and financial difficulties do not absolve the sacco of its statutory obligation to refund a withdrawing member's deposits. The Tribunal further noted that share capital of Kshs. 10,000 is not ordinarily refundable, and thus only the deposit portion was awarded. The claimant's compliance with withdrawal procedures and provision of notice was deemed...

Court Disposition

judgment for the claimant

Orders

  • Respondent to pay claimant Kshs. 121,800 as refund of deposits.
  • Interest at Tribunal rates from the date of filing the claim until payment in full.